Answer:
C.
Explanation:
to provide readers with steps for helping a friend in need
to persuade readers to respect the privacy of peers
Hope this helps!!!
<span>A.
</span><span> us; predicate nominative
</span>A predicate nominative explains the complete verb. Ex: Charlie is my <em>son.</em>
1. Text messaging - you don't have to respond right away.
2. Wireless calling - you can make and receive calls from wherever you are and it is easier to contact people and to stay safe because you can let people know where you are
<span />
The logical connection is absent. The answer lacks any explanation to the question being made. The main problem is that the interviewer is left with a very incomplete response, one that requires a lot of work from part of the interviewer. In this case in particular, even if there were a connection between reducing rates and unemployment, it seems that the candidate does not really have an answer to the question. That is why the fallacy is the lack of connection or relevance between the question and the answer
Answer:
A) Adjective phrase
Explanation:
¨a six year old¨ This term here is explained something or giving it detail so it´s an adjective.
Hope this helps, forgive me if it's wrong.