1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
guapka [62]
3 years ago
10

How did the phrase in the Supreme

History
1 answer:
Vesnalui [34]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The answer is below

Explanation:

In the Brown vs Board of Education, that was otherwise known as Brown II, the Supreme Court ruled that, in order to abolish segregation in public schools, the lower federal courts were to “enter such orders and decrees consistent with this opinion as are necessary and proper to admit to public schools on a racially nondiscriminatory basis with all deliberate speed the parties to these cases.”

However, the phrase "ALL DELIBERATE SPEED" in the rulings create ambiguous but crucial meaning, in which it was later defined and explain to mean "at a slow pace". This implies that, the process of abolishment of segregation is based on each states timetable.

Hence, while some states acted promptly according to the rulings, some states took and exploited the hole in the judgement to delay the end of segregation.

Therefore, the phrase "ALL DELIBERATE SPEED " in the Supreme Court's Brown decision unintentionally permit Southern schools to delay desegregation as it was translated to mean "Slow".

You might be interested in
Which of these is a true statement?
Alex73 [517]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Gawain sa Pagkatuto Bilang 3: Basahin at pag-aralan ang tula.
jeyben [28]
Wrong server or did u keyboard smash?
5 0
3 years ago
Before it became an independent nation what was Italy like
Anastasy [175]

Answer: I dont know

Explanation:

I dont know

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. Which streets are home to the wealthiest residents in this section of London?
11111nata11111 [884]

Answer: Knightsbridge and the City of Westminster are among the wealthiest.

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Which action would violate the concept of rule of law?
WINSTONCH [101]
The rule of law implies rule according to law. It also implies that the government must rule under the edicts of the law. As such, may act unilaterally or arbitrarily outside the confines of the law. The government should not therefore demand civil damages or undertake criminal punishment without strict adherence to the well established and clearly stated laws and procedures. As such, doing anything contrary to this violates the concept of rule of law.  
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What does legislative bodies mean?
    14·1 answer
  • 9. Unlike the Portuguese, who had rounded Africa and were sailing east toward Asia, Christopher Columbus decided to sail _______
    6·2 answers
  • Compare William McKinley and William Jennings Bryan
    5·2 answers
  • What did the Sacco-Vanzetti case highlight about American society in the 1920s?
    6·2 answers
  • The muddle passage references the movement of slaves from?
    8·1 answer
  • Why didn't the Hudson's Bay Company want any "black robes" to come?​
    6·1 answer
  • What the status of the Paris Peace talks when Nixon took office?​
    11·1 answer
  • Do you think President Johnson’s actions deserved to have him removed from office? Why or why not?
    14·1 answer
  • 2. Locating In what parts of the Sahara have groups been<br> able to settle permanently
    8·1 answer
  • What was the biggest company in the United States during Roosevelt's presidency?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!