Answer:
The Answer
Explanation:
Luckily, English is my best subject. The diagram supports it by having a picture example and pointing out the some of the minor details that aren't said in the paragraph. I hope this was able to help some!
Answer:
You did not provide the article or answer options for that question, but we can say that celebrities can be good examples for teenagers when they get involved in situations that promote the good of society, in addition to assuming positive and non-destructive behaviors . Thus, we can say that the author used evidence that relates to these concepts to support his claims.
Explanation:
You may have noticed that teenagers are easily influenced by the media and celebrities that can be seen on media platforms. This can play a bad or good role in teenagers' lives depending on which celebrities they take on as role models.
In short, celebrities establish good influences on adolescents' lives when they assume beneficial and non-destructive behaviors, such as a clean life from drugs, fights and eating disorders, for example. In addition, celebrities are good examples when they engage in activities beneficial to society and when they are opposed to prejudiced, discriminatory and destructive guidelines.
Answer:
pls repost another question with all the statements
Answer:
The author believes that the best approach towards free speech in the private sector is for the private entities to censor speech by their users.
Explanation:
According to the author, private entities were responsible for the censoring of free speech not the state.
He went on to say that these private sectors have the rights to offer these regulations on their different platforms and make exclusions to certain speech of their members.
Evidence can be see in the third paragraph. The author implied here that private sector has a right to invoke the first amendment clause that limits speeches that are lawless, full of threat and obscenity.
Answer:
Explanation:
To make the world a better place for everyone is not a simple task, The majority of you may ask: "Why?". Well, One of the mostbasic reasons is that this world is ihabited by billions and billions of people, and if it's difficult and nearly impossible to find a single topic in which a whole country agrees, imagine finding something that joins the interests of the whole world?
Secondly, accordong to Freudian theory, human beings always have an uncomplete desire. You yourself, maybe you need something in this moment, and when you get it, there will be another object of your desire. Human beings never stop looking for complete happiness, or something that fullfills all of their needs, something they never, ever find. The majority don't even know what they are looking for.
Anyway, in order to make of this world a better place for anyone, from the biologistpoint of view, we humans should start taking care of it a little more. If every single human being starts recycling, or throwing their rubbish in the bin instead of in the street, pollution would gradually decrease until it finally gets to the minimum.
Anothe way of making the world a better placewould be trying to be more tolerant among each other. It's not difficult to stop saying bad comments or sharing destructive opinions towards other people. If every human being could save only 1 negative comment per day, the atmosphere would be a little less harsh for anyone.
