Hmmm not sure exactly what you are asking the wording is strange but this seems to be showing Racism towards blacks.
Answer:
20.875
Explanation:
18+24+17+21+24+16+29+18=167/8=20.875
Answer:
perceived behavioral control
Explanation:
According to my research on the theory of planned behavior, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the factor most likely to interfere with Tom quitting smoking is his perceived behavioral control. This is defined as the individuals perception of believing whether or not a behavior is within their control. If Tom does not believe quitting smoking is in his control, then he will not be able to quit regardless of how many people tell him how important it is to do so.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer: hierarchy of effects
Explanation:
The Hierarchy of Effects model which was created by Robert J Lavidge and Gary A Steiner in 1961 posits that advertisers should design adverts in such a way that the intended individuals go through 6 stages being;
a) Awareness - customer should be aware of the brand
b) Knowledge - ensure that positive knowledge about the brand is widespread
c) Liking - Prop up the emotional benefits of the brand to make people like it
d) Preference - Ensure that the points that make your brand different from other similar brands are well communicated so that the individual builds a preference
e) Conviction - the doubt in the individuals' mind must be removed here.
f) Purchase - most crucial stage. Here the product needs to be sold in a hassle free way to the consumer.
Answer:
C. They can effectively leverage the national and local advertising programs sponsored by the franchiser.
Explanation:
If Sarah and Candice obtain the franchise rights from an already established designer brand, they will have lesser freedom to make business-related decisions as they would have to be accountable to the designer brand based on the terms & conditions which they agreed to. <u>Hence, option A is not a valid argument</u>
If Sarah and Candice obtain the franchise rights from an already established designer brand, they will have lesser flexibility to add or delete a product from the existing line because they do not have an exclusive right to the franchise. Such decision falls uner the jurisiction of Monarch. <u>Hence, option B is not a valid argument</u>
If Sarah and Candice were to purchase the franchise rights of Monarch, they would have to share a portion of their good revenues & share profits with the franchiser since they enjoy the publicity associated with the brand name. <u>Hence, option D is not a valid argument</u>
If Sarah and Candice were to purchase the franchise rights of Monarch, they cannot commercialize their creativity and ideas without facing any restrictions from the franchiser. Any such creative ideas has to be endorse by Monarch. <u>Hence, option E is not a valid argument</u>
<u />
If Sarah and Candice were to purchase the franchise rights of Monarch, they stand to benefit from the publicity & advertisements of Monarch at no extra cost to their startup. They can effectively leverage the national and local advertising programs sponsored by the franchiser. <u>Hence, option C is the valid argument to convince Sarah</u>