In a comparison of the ancient cities of Athens and Sparta, Sparta placed more emphasis on war.
<h3>
How can ancient cities of Athens and Sparta, be compared?</h3>
Athens are the one that shifted their focus on culture, they are more concerned on the preservation of their culture compare to Sparta.
It should be noted that Sparta on the other hand focus more on war, however the oligarchy structure that is more seen in Sparta make them to be able to keep war as a top priority.
Learn more about Sparta on:
brainly.com/question/15909150
#SPJ1
Answer:
The answer is C.Local credit union
Explanation:
Firstly, Carlos owns a small, local business, so using the Fed would be unpractical (by the way I'm sure the Federal Reserve is the wrong answer because I took the test and it said so). Wall Street is a symbol for the U.S. financial markets, not an actual corporation that he could use to raise money; its figurative. Using the stock market would mean that Carlos would have to sell some ownership of his business so he can make money. In summary, your best answer is C. Local Credit Union.
The correct answer is Bangladesh, formerly known as East Pakistan.
After the Partition of India, two countries were created: India and Pakistan. The later was composed of the areas with a Muslim majority, but geographically it had two parts, which lied far away from each other and had no land connection: West and East Pakistan. the Indo-Pakistan war concerned the split of the two parts into independent countries.
Answer:
It is called the Columbian Exchange because of Christopher Columbus' widespread transfer of culture, plants, animals, human populations, technology, diseases, and ideas between the Americas, West Africa, and the Old World. This happened between the 15th and 16th centuries
I hope that this helps
Answer:
private conformity; public conformity
Explanation:
Sherif's study type of comformity is likely the result of private conformity, while the one in Asch's study was public conformity. Private conformity is defined mind alteration or change that happens when a person take accepts the position taken by others privately or in seclusion. Public conformity is a superficial in nature, it is a change in the character or behavior under due observation. it has no corresponding change of opinion and occurs as a result of real/imagined group pressure. The situation in sherif's study is very ambiguous while Asch's study is not ambiguous
