The system of social classes arose in India with the arrival of the Aryans. The term 'Aryan' was derived from a Sanskrit word which means 'noble'. Thus, they referred to themselves as those belonging to the more superior race. They were fair-skinned as they came from the northern region. They took control of the region, disregarding the culture of the natives. The social classes were the Kshatriyas or warriors, Brahmans or priests, Vaishyas or farmers and craftsmen, and the Sudra Varnas or the simple workers in the society. They was a struggle for power between the Kshatriyas and the Brahmans, but in the end, the Brahmans became the powerful leaders of the society they built.
I think you could look this up and google and read about them too so you can read on them as well
Responsibility for the holocaust is the difficulty of an ongoing historical debate that has spanned numerous decades. The debate approximately the origins of the holocaust is referred to as functionalism as opposed to intentionalism. Intentionalists which include lucy dawidowicz argue that adolf hitler planned the extermination of the jewish people as early as 1918, and that he personally oversaw its execution. But, functionalists which includes raul hilberg argue that the extermination plans advanced in tiers, due to initiatives by bureaucrats who had been responding to other policy disasters. The debate has settled to a massive diploma as historians have conceded that both positions have merit. The primary obligation for the holocaust rests on hitler and the nazi celebration leadership, but operations to persecute jews, gypsies, and others had been additionally perpetrated by the schutzstaffel (ss), the wehrmacht, regular german citizens as well as by using collaborationist individuals of diverse ecu governments, inclusive of their soldiers and civilians alike. A bunch of things contributed to the surroundings under which atrocities were dedicated across the continent, starting from general racism (such as antisemitism), spiritual hatred, blind obedience, political opportunism, coercion, profiteering, and xenophobia.
D) perfection of the assembly line process of production
The Supreme Court uses judicial review to declare actions by the President or Congress to be invalid if they are contrary to the Constitution. The Constitution is the supreme law of the land and no presidential act or congressional laws may conflict with it. The Courts are the interpreters of the laws and as such they interpret the Constitution and laws to decide if they conflict with one another.
Further, it allows the Judicial Branch to "define" that law by answering questions about it that are not spoken to directly in the regulation itself.
Chief Justice John Marshall clearly affirmed the power of judicial review in the case Marbury v. Madison, (1803), when the Court declared Section 13 of the Judicial Act of 1789 unconstitutional. It should be noted that the US Supreme Court, for the most part, determines what laws to review based on decisions made in lower Federal Courts. In most cases the Court waits for a case to be presented to them. It then can reject hearing the case or depend on the ruling of the lower courts.