1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Digiron [165]
3 years ago
6

In the late 1800s, the French Empire

History
2 answers:
GenaCL600 [577]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

c

Explanation:

galina1969 [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: conquered parts of Southern Asia

Explanation:

Hope this helps

You might be interested in
Why do political parties try to avoid contested conventions?
Ksivusya [100]
A candidate from a split party typically doesn’t win the presidency and a contested convention doesn’t create momentum that a candidate needs to oppose the other party
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Pullman strike ended with
Ivahew [28]
The Pullman strike ended with widespread violence and the President at the time (Grover Cleveland) sent out the army to stop the strikes from obstructing the trains from running. The Pullman Strike was a boycott which shut down much of the passenger and freight trains west of Detroit because of reduction wages. Many of these workers were laid off and had their wages lowered, but did not have their rent lowered which was essentially unfair, as they all lived in towns for train workers.
7 0
3 years ago
Compare and contrast Hobbes’ and Locke’s views of human nature and the role government should play
svet-max [94.6K]

Thomas Hobbes believed that people were inherently suspicious of one another and in competition with one another.  This led him to propose that government should have supreme authority over people in order to maintain security and a stable society.

John Locke argued that people were born as blank slates, open to learning all things by experience.  Ultimately this meant Locke viewed human beings in a mostly positive way, and so his approach to government was to keep the people empowered to establish and regulate their own governments for the sake of building good societies.

Further explanation:

Both English philosophers believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people.  But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.

Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in <em>Leviathan</em>  in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War.  He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and evil toward one another as a result.  Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.

John Locke published his <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government</em> in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England.  Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings.  Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.

In teaching the difference between Hobbes and Locke, I've often put it this way.  If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way.   Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved.    Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith.  But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke.   :-)

8 0
3 years ago
Which policy or initiative contributed most to the nuclear arms race between the United States and the Soviet Union
nika2105 [10]

The policy contributed most to the nuclear arms race was Mutual Assured Destruction


This means that both sides knew that any attack upon the other would be devastating to themselves, therefore restraining them from attacking the other. Each side possesses enough nuclear weapons to obliterate the other side that causes them to restrain from attacking afraid of the annihilation.

3 0
3 years ago
Why did the African American community believe their boycott would succeed in ending bus segregation?
Strike441 [17]

Answer:

Buses lost the majority of their business.

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How many years can a senator serve in the Georgia General Assembly?
    10·1 answer
  • Why did Roosevelt say he wanted to increase the number of judges on the Supreme Court?
    12·2 answers
  • Why did jefferson believe that customs duties would help create a stable economic system?
    10·1 answer
  • What changed after the boston massacre?
    10·1 answer
  • The Puritan communities in New England in the 1600s mainly emphasized by what?
    9·2 answers
  • Which best defines the concept of popular sovereignty?
    15·2 answers
  • Describe how metaphysics operates in a religion?
    6·1 answer
  • How did the Christian kingdoms persecute Muslims and Jews during the<br> Reconquista?
    9·1 answer
  • This map shows that the silk road_____?
    9·2 answers
  • Someone plz help me :
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!