1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
IRINA_888 [86]
3 years ago
9

Which of the following articles from the Constitution could be used to effectively argue in favor of judicial review?

History
2 answers:
masha68 [24]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

4. The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority.

Explanation:

Number 4 is the best option that argues in favor of judicial review as it holds that the judicial's power should extend to ALL cases, in law and equity, under the Constitution, laws or treaties of the nation. Many interpret it to mean that the Judicial, then, has the power to review the actions of the Legislative and the Executive in case they do not comply with the law.

For example, if the legislative branch enacts a law that is not consistent with the Constitution (like a law that establishes a religion) the Supreme Court has the power to review it and declare it unconstitutional as it goes against the first amendment; and if the President were to start collecting taxes (which it is not one of their functions), the Supreme Court would also have the power to declare such act unconstitutional.

makkiz [27]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

I would have to say that the best possible answer would be D, or four.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Nhjegfnlkgjegn jsn gkjl
Karo-lina-s [1.5K]

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

Yes is a good answer for this becaude Yes

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did Europeans learn from Marco polo?
PilotLPTM [1.2K]
Books..     and .....  <span>News of his journey's increased interest in Asia.</span>




6 0
3 years ago
Why did the colonists criticize the Stamp Acts as "taxation without representation"?
nasty-shy [4]
The colonists criticized the Stamp Acts as "taxation without representation", because the colonists did not have consent over this form of taxation imposed on them. It was a decision made in the British Parliament without anyone representing the colonies when this decision was upheld.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did the Einstein-Szilard letter warn President Roosevelt about in 1939?
Lina20 [59]

Answer:

That Germany was researching nuclear weapons.

Explanation:

This letter was written by Leo Szilárd and signed by Albert Einstein, and sent to warn the President of US Franklin D. Rooselvelt in 1932, about Germany developing atomic bombs.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
5) Which of these BEST describes Theodore Roosevelt's "Square Deal" policies?
umka2103 [35]
Is there any choices? so we can help you
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of these events happened first? The Fair Labor Standards Act was established. The Second New Deal began. The recession beg
    13·1 answer
  • Which Frenchman explored the St. Lawrence River?
    14·1 answer
  • Important things about the history of silk production and the lessons
    15·1 answer
  • 10. Which of the following shows German advances in
    5·1 answer
  • What disadvantage did Germany have durning the first years of world war 1
    10·1 answer
  • What was the Russian revolution​
    9·1 answer
  • How did napoleon build and then lose an empire?
    14·2 answers
  • What is the difference between unicameral and bicameral?
    8·1 answer
  • How did humans first populate the Americas?
    7·2 answers
  • How does Leopold II hide his true intentions in the Congo behind a <br> “charade of philanthropy?”
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!