The answer is A no question. The united did not side with the axis and they certainly were not neutral.
<span>Most did not strike it rich, but they remained in California and bettered the state's infrastructure. This was because they were a ready labor force, and the amount of gold in the gold fields had been wildly exaggerated. There just was not enough gold for all of the forty niners to strike it rich.</span>
In his book, A People's History of the United States, Howard Zinn cites examples from US colonial history of the gap between rich and poor in colonial life.
A key study cited by Zinn examined tax registers from Boston, showing that the top 1% of the population held 25% of the wealth in 1687, and that by 1770, the top 1% of property owners in Boston owned 44% of the wealth. The study also noted that the bulk of Boston's population were not property owners. The percentage of adult males in Boston who owned no property doubled between 1687 and 1770 (from 14% to 29%).
Zinn cited additional items, regarding overcrowding of poorhouses (giving a notable example from New York) and a general increase throughout the colonies of the "wandering poor" who had no real means of support. He also cited examples of workers' strikes against employers in the colonies because of low wages.
Answer:
1 + 1 = 2
Explanation:
positive 1 added with positive 1 equals positive 2
Answer:
81 miles to Houston, TX.
174 miles to Baton Rouge, LA.
221 miles to Austin, TX.
239 miles to New Orleans, LA.
251 miles to Dallas, TX.
252 miles to Garland, TX.
252 miles to Corpus Christi, TX.
260 miles to Plano, TX.
Explanation:
