1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
aev [14]
3 years ago
5

what were some "warning signs" that indicate that the war in Vietnam would not end well for the U.S. or its ally South Vietnam

History
1 answer:
Setler79 [48]3 years ago
5 0

ppl died and thats not good

You might be interested in
What was the impact of the U.S. decision to enter World War I?
marusya05 [52]
The size and enthusiasm of the American forces bolstered the French and British.
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was Communism considered "un-<br> American"?
Wewaii [24]

Answer:

Communism opposes everything in America

Explanation:

This may be a huge explanation I'm about to write due to how objective I have to be to answer this question. Communism is both a economic and social idea in which Marxism and Authoritarianism are combined. A lot of Americans were taught to hate communism because America is a capitalist world and is he leading business tycoon in the world, which means that even before any communist nations even existed, America still hated communism. Communism is an ideology that is always considered to be labour comprehensive and proceeds  in the direction of labour rights, while America has no concern for labour interests. There are going to be nations I'm going to use in this example, The USSR and China (not Taiwan). These two Nations use Communism in a sort of autocratic way. Let's start off with China; China uses communism in an autocratic way that prevents you from being able to protest, and if they wanted to do some project or something they wouldn't give the slightest care if thousands of buildings and edifices were to be destroyed. Now we have the USSR; the USSR was under many autocratic regimes and one we could all agree on is Stalin's regime. Stalin in some sense wasn't really a communist, but just a straight up dictator that killed 10s of millions. There was the Ukrainian potato famine which was supposed to prove that collectivization worked, but instead it killed an estimate 20 million, we then have the great purge which killed 1.2 million, and then we have world war 2 which killed 27 million. This proved America that communism is hell and should never be trusted in America. What I'm trying to say here is that Communism takes away a lot of people's rights and killed millions in the past, and America wants to have these rights to give opportunity and freedom to everyone. I know the industrial revolution also killed millions too because of the upper class exploiting the workers, but that is a discussion for later.

5 0
3 years ago
Which summary of the 19th century most clearly emphasizes the theme of economic change?
IgorLugansk [536]

<u>Answer:</u>

<em>B. mostly agrarian society became largely urbanizes as a result of the industrial revolution </em>

<em></em>

<u>Explanation:</u>

The industrial revolution has a significant development period in the eighteenth-century that had transformed the rural and other agrarian societies, mainly in Europe and industrialized the urban centers in America.

When goods had been painstakingly crafted, the production increased in many quantities through machines and factories. This was made possible because of the introduction of types of machinery and other technologies that were used in different industries.

3 0
3 years ago
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand J
frez [133]

Answer:

We're looking for a,b such that

\dfrac{9x-20}{(x+6)^2}=\dfrac a{x+6}+\dfrac b{(x+6)^2}

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
What advantages and disadvantages might being nonaligned have offered a developing nation during the Cold War?
Anni [7]

Answer:

One advantage is that they did not have to choose sides. Because of this they did not have to be involved in the war. If they had to choose then they would have been forced to be in the war. Another advantage would be that they could trade with any nation because they were neutral. A disadvantage would be that they had no allies, Another would be that the nation did not have support of other nations.

Explanation:

Please do Brainliest:) thank you

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • By July of 1945, President Truman understood that Japan had a _______________ policy. "no surrender" "no shame" "Japan's suprema
    7·2 answers
  • How did the actual results of World War II differ from the agreements made before the end of the war
    7·1 answer
  • Historians label an event as a turning point when it what
    8·1 answer
  • Why was the Berlin Airlift successful in terms of the geography of Eastern Europe and East-West relations?
    5·1 answer
  • how did the desire for national independence among ethnic groups weaken and ultimately destroy the Austrian empire
    12·1 answer
  • The neutrality act of 1939
    7·1 answer
  • How did william penn get settlers to come to his colony?​
    9·2 answers
  • What led the Iranian people to revolt in 1979?
    7·1 answer
  • Read the passage retold from The Tale of Genji. Summarize one of the central ideas from the passage. PLSS TO IT QUICK!!
    15·2 answers
  • Did The articles of confederation have a bicameral legislature ?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!