Answer:
The protagonist's cultural background creates conflicts in between him and his daughters. His daughters wanted to get settled in American society and get assimilate in it, go to the malls, movies in bright daylight, but he and his wife wanted to hold their Dominican culture which creates the conflict between them. Both the parents was not good in accent language and not updating their lifestyle according to American society on the other hand their daughters were good in accent and writing and in identifying themselves according to new culture. When the narrator wrote the speech for her teachers day and read it to her family, her father did not like the speech. It was disrespectful according to him because he was not good in language, and he had no understanding of phrases this was also one of the main conflict between them due to their cultural background.
Explanation:
Poetry is a form of writing in the literature that uses rhymes and aesthetics that depicts the imaginative and vivid descriptions of the emotional and the poet's perspective about the topic.
Free verse does not have a specific form and does not follow the set rhyme.
<h3>What are different poem patterns?</h3>
- <u>Haiku </u>is a short Japanese form of poetry that uses three lines with five syllables that do not necessarily rhyme.
- <u>A villanelle </u>is a French form of poetry that includes five three-line stanzas and are used to portray topics like love, loss, celebration and sadness.
- <u>Free verse </u>is a form of poetry that does not includes regular pattern and rhymes. It looks like a speech and is generally used for depicting the meaning of the topic to the readers.
Therefore, option c is correct.
Learn more about free verse here:
brainly.com/question/1622016
Answer:
B
Explanation:
I can't think until I've had coffee. I don't know if its the smell, the caffeine or the habit of making it every day.
<span>false cause
When a speaker or writer tries to connect two things that don't directly have an effect on each other as having an effect on each other, it is false cause. Saying that one thing directly causes another when there is no proof or factual evidence to back that up weakens an argument significantly. </span>