The purchase of Alaska was profitable a great deal. First, it must be noted that the purchase was for Geo-political reasons.The actual price was repaid in twenty years through the sale of fur seal skin. In addition, huge deposits of copper,oil and timber hugely exceeded the benefits. currently, it is agreed that the purchase is over 7 times profitable.The fact that the purchase proved profitable implies that the secretary of state was ahead of several of his many critics.
Answer:
The Dakota War of 1862, also known as the Sioux Uprising, the Dakota Uprising, the Sioux Outbreak of 1862, the Dakota Conflict, the U.S.–Dakota War of 1862 or Little Crow's War, was an armed conflict between the United States and several bands of Dakota (also known as the eastern 'Sioux'). It began on August 17, 1862, along the Minnesota River in southwest Minnesota, four years after its admission as a state. Throughout the late 1850s in the lead-up to the war, treaty violations by the United States and late or unfair annuity payments by Indian agents caused increasing hunger and hardship among the Dakota. During the war, the Dakota made extensive attacks on hundreds of settlers and immigrants, which resulted in settler deaths, and caused many to flee the area. Intense desire for immediate revenge ended with soldiers capturing hundreds of Dakota men and interning their families. A military tribunal quickly tried the men, sentencing 303 to death for their crimes. President Lincoln would later commute the sentence of 264 of them. The mass hanging of 38 Dakota men was conducted on December 26, 1862, in Mankato, Minnesota; it was the largest mass execution in United States history.Little Crow attempted to restrain his tribe from attacking white settlers and the US government, but on the 17 August 1862 four Sioux men killed five white settlers. The following day, Little Crow launched an attack on the Indian Agency believing that they would be too preoccupied by the civil war to fight back. Those are the facts , of why he went to war ,
Explanation:
Yurt
Answer:
Socially responsible behavior implies a person’s awareness of the fullness of the requirements imposed on him by society, the state, and those around him, and not only awareness, but also the fulfillment of these requirements. Otherwise, a response occurs of the environment in which the individual is located and acts. Hence the right of society to social control over the actions of its members, their compliance with historically established or consciously formed standards. The value of social responsibility lies in the fact that it is intended to discipline members of society, to encourage them to positive, conscious, useful behavior. Collaboration of business with authoritarian regimes is the socially irresponsible behavior of the company, and socially responsible citizens can boycott such a company.
Often sanctions are seen by politicians as an alternative to the use of military force, accompanied by lower costs, but no less effective in terms of achieving the intended goals. The success of the sanctions cannot be measured by the amount of economic damage inflicted on the recipient country if the purpose of the sanctions is to change the political course of the country. In the event that a country violates human rights, the imposition of sanctions seems appropriate and deserves support.
Explanation:
The reason why the populist party appealed to so many people is because this part sought to further the goals of the "common man" as opposed to the welthy elite class in America.
They should mostly ask if a hydroelectric power plant emit less CO2 than a thermal power plant. In global warming, CO2 is one of the elements that causes global warming.
