What best explains the relationship of the Mauryan Empire government to business activities in the Empire?

Social Studies

1 answer:

blagie [28]3 years ago

7 0

Answer: The attitude of the government towards the empire made prosperity possible.

Explanation:

Before the Mayans, there were a large number of private armies and kingdoms. Chandragupta Maurya formed a government that provided stability and unification. Such a policy stabilized the empire. Political and military unity has exercised greater control, which has affected security but also improved trade activities. The Mauryan Empire was founded in 322 BC by Chandragupt Maury, who overthrew the Nanda Dynasty and quickly expanded its power west across central and western India to exploit the disruption of local authorities following the withdrawal of Alexander the Great's armies.

You might be interested in

Which services are provided by the United States government to all citizens?

RideAnS [48]

Answer:

highways and bridges on public roads

5 0

3 years ago

6. What was the main point of disagreement regarding the Berlin Crisis in 1961?

Zarrin [17]

During the 1950s a steady outflow of refugees from the Soviet occupation zone to the West consisted primarily of young people of working age. By 1950 some 1.6 million had migrated to the western zones

5 0

3 years ago

Why do you think people conform to peer pressure? What impact do you think this can have on an individual? Do you think you conf

Serga [27]

People conform to peer pressure because as imperfect humans we don't always make the right decisions so people conform to peer pressure because they may feel left out or accused of not doing what others are doing. Impact? well peer pressure is common and devastating so its like a burned scar emotionally. Me? No due to my age I haven't been in that type of situation but soon I will and I hope I don't give in to pressure.

4 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Do you think the death penalty should be used as a punishment for crime? Why or why not?

sasho [114]

For severe crimes, like taking a life of a human being, yes. I think it would in that case.

But I don't think it should be a penalty to such a large punishment such as a death penalty, because what if the criminal did something minor, like stealing from a small candy store or something like that? Would you really give that kind of person a punishment such as death, which the victim cannot redo life and try to improve as a better person?

I think the death penalty should be used for people who are long gone in mind and cannot come back, if you would know what I mean (people who don't feel regret for something like murder and such). In my opinion, that is! :)

Thanks,
-xxred24

5 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A democratic government is answerable to the citizens as the citizens ________

Ksenya-84 [330]

A democratic government is answerable to the citizens as the citizens are the ones who elect the representatives. If they don't answer the citizens then they'll lose in the next elections.

5 0

3 years ago