<span>Without placing too implicit faith in the account above given, it must be agreed, that if a worthy pretext for so dangerous an experiment as setting houses on fire (especially in these days) could be assigned in favor of any culinary object, that pretext and excuse might be found in roast pig.</span>
Answer:
relaxed
Explanation:
i got it right on the test.
Mr. Praed says he knows nothing of Mrs. Warren's profession, but his behavior indicates otherwise. However, he does not seem bothered by the fact that Mrs. Warren is a "working woman." He is nonjudgmental. As an architect, he is not of the upper class, but of the middle class.
Mr. Crofts, however, is directly involved in Mrs. Warren's profession by the fact that he owns brothels. His moral sensibility is much worse than Mr. Praed's as a result. He is a member of the upper class and feels very entitled to his wealth--also lowering his moral sensibility.
This may mean that the person in the future will not be able to understand or comprehend what a person is saying to them, if they do not listen to them now.......hopefully this helps
Answer:
Describe how the author connects the final paragraph to the paragraphs that came before it. Explain how all four paragraphs in the article work together to develop the central idea.
Explanation:
