1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
EastWind [94]
3 years ago
7

Cohen's Shatterbelt Theory predicted that armed conflict would MOST likely occur in which of the following countries? a.france b

. Hungary c. Norway d. Spain e. South Africa and why?
Geography
1 answer:
prisoha [69]3 years ago
7 0
Norway is mostly not considered an area of armed conflict because it doesn't have any armed conflict. 
<span> Norway is not considered an area of armed conflict within the terms of Cohen's Shatterbelt Theory because nothing whatsoever about Norway and its surrounding neighbours corresponds to anything at all in Cohen's Shatterbelt Theory. Hopefully this helps :)

</span>
You might be interested in
A is the midpoint of CT. CA = 3x + 6 and CT = 24, find x.​
PSYCHO15rus [73]
24= 3x+6
-6 -6

18 = 3x
— —
3 3

6 = x

8 0
3 years ago
What were the first spainsh adventurers seeking along the northern coast of south america
steposvetlana [31]
The first Spanish adventurers were seeking gold along the northern coast of South America. 
4 0
3 years ago
Explain how the sun changes over short periods of time
KengaRu [80]

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

Because the Sun continues to 'burn' hydrogen into helium in its core, the core slowly collapses and heats up, causing the outer layers of the Sun to grow larger. This has been going on since soon after the Sun was formed 4.5 billion years ago.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following happens when a low - mass star runs out of fuel ? Choose all that apply.
Zinaida [17]
The correct answer is a,b and c.
a) its core becomes a white dwarf.
b) its outer layers form a nebula , or vast cloud of gas and dust.
c)its outer layers expand , and the star becomes a red giant.
4 0
3 years ago
‘The maps are not true representations of the real locations as on the Earth’s surface.’ Do you agree? Give reasons in support o
Andrews [41]

Answer:

People also ask

Why are maps not always completely an accurate representation of Earth's surface?

It is absolutely impossible to depict a round earth on a flat surface without sacrificing at least some accuracy. In fact, a map can only be accurate in one of four domains: shape, area, distance, or direction. ... The Peters projection combats this area distortion by sacrificing accuracy of shape, distance, and direction.17 Jun 2018

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What kind of writing tells a real story about someones life
    11·1 answer
  • Why is the bottom layer of the ocean the coldest?
    8·1 answer
  • How do most people in Oceania make their living?
    9·1 answer
  • The vast majority of the world nations have which system of government
    13·1 answer
  • What a Geologist Sees The photograph below shows large boulders scattered across polished bedrock in eastern Canada. Which of th
    9·1 answer
  • Which European power has NOT held colonial possessions in Southeast Asia?
    6·1 answer
  • Analyze and explain how Rome was develop in to a city and became prosperous enough to raise an army.
    9·1 answer
  • Yeet????///////////////////////////?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
    15·2 answers
  • Examples of traditional agriculture did not include
    8·1 answer
  • 4. Carbon Dioxide, Methane, Nitrous Oxide and Sulfur Hexafluoride are all examples of Greenhouse Gases.
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!