1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lelu [443]
3 years ago
6

In Athens, citizens included

History
2 answers:
krok68 [10]3 years ago
7 0

trade routes is what your looking for .


lidiya [134]3 years ago
5 0

Males over the age of 18.

Alphabet

You might be interested in
Which sentence best describes the French sale of the Louisiana Purchase to the United States?
krok68 [10]
A. At the time this was during the French Revolution so they were willing to sell the land for less to the US because they were rivals of Britain
4 0
3 years ago
which of the following developments took place as a part of the reformation period in 16th and 17th-century europe? A) the peopl
lapo4ka [179]
It's between b or c. Im leaning towards c. 16th & 17th century was the renaissance and reformation.
4 0
3 years ago
What do cave painting reveal about Paleolithic people?
aksik [14]

Answer:

That they were able to communicate and by using art. It also possibly reveals that they had a religion because some of the paintings look as if they resemble gods/godesses.

Explanation:

Please mark Brainliest :)

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In your opinion, should civil and criminal cases require the same amount of proof? Why?
olchik [2.2K]
<span>Crimes are considered offenses against the state, or society as a whole. That means that even though one person might murder another person, murder itself is considered an offense to everyone in society. Accordingly, crimes against the state are prosecuted by the state, and the prosecutor (not the victim) files the case in court as a representative of the state. If it were a civil case, then the wronged party would file the case.Criminal offenses and civil offenses are generally different in terms of their punishment. Criminal cases will have jail time as a potential punishment, whereas civil cases generally only result in monetary damages or orders to do or not do something. Note that a criminal case may involve both jail time and monetary punishments in the form of fines.The standard of proof is also very different in a criminal case versus a civil case. Crimes must generally be proved "beyond a reasonable doubt", whereas civil cases are proved by lower standards of proof such as "the preponderance of the evidence" (which essentially means that it was more likely than not that something occurred in a certain way). The difference in standards exists because civil liability is considered less blameworthy and because the punishments are less severe.Criminal cases almost always allow for a trial by jury. Civil cases do allow juries in some instances, but many civil cases will be decided by a judge.A defendant in a criminal case is entitled to an attorney, and if he or she can't afford one, the state must provide an attorney. A defendant in a civil case is not given an attorney and must pay for one, or else defend him or herself.The protections afforded to defendants under criminal law are considerable (such as the protection against illegal searches and seizures under the 4th Amendment). Many of these well known protections are not available to a defendant in a civil case.</span>

 

In general, because criminal cases have greater consequences - the possibility of jail and even death - criminal cases have many more protections in place and are harder to prove.

The Same Conduct Can Produce Civil and Criminal Liability

Although criminal and civil cases are treated very differently, many people often fail to recognize that the same conduct can result in both criminal and civil liability. Perhaps one of the most famous examples of this is the OJ Simpson trial. The same conduct led to a murder trial (criminal) and a wrongful death trial (civil). In part because of the different standards of proof, there was not enough evidence for a jury to decide that OJ Simpson was guilty "beyond a reasonable doubt" in the criminal murder case. In the civil trial, however, the jury found enough evidence to conclude that OJ Simpson wrongfully caused his wife's death by a "preponderance of the evidence".

6 0
3 years ago
Plz help me I am timed
Llana [10]

Answer:

russia!

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Sumerians developed many invention
    15·1 answer
  • Which part of the document makes it clear that the United States supports the formation of the state of Israel?                
    12·2 answers
  • Did stephen crane write humorous work and adventure storeis
    14·1 answer
  • How did US foreign policy philosophy change after WW2
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following outcomes occurred as a result of the U.S. invasion of
    15·1 answer
  • What is one reason that more people didn't foresee the economic collapse of the 1930s?
    6·2 answers
  • Why are discussion and deliberation important in addressing gun violence?
    9·2 answers
  • Why was the constitution restricted African Americans right to vote
    11·2 answers
  • Hi, how are you? Help me with this question! please!
    12·2 answers
  • The Pequot War was an example of
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!