1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Monica [59]
3 years ago
11

The Constitution of the United States protects the right to freedom of speech. According to the majority opinion offered from th

e case
Schenck vs United States, how did the Supreme Court decide that the right of freedom of speech is not absolute?

A) If the speech is symbolic in nature then it is not allowed.

B) If the speech creates a danger to the United States it is not allowed.

C) If the speech reflects negatively on someone's character then it is not
allowed.

D) If the speech exposes classified information from the United States then it
is not allowed.
History
1 answer:
evablogger [386]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: The answer is B.

Explanation: It because the court decided that even though the first amendment protects the freedom of speech, if the speech creates a danger to the United States then it can be restricted.

You might be interested in
When Jesus called Matthew, His love reached out to the:
atroni [7]
The answer is A. the outcasts. Matthew was a tax collector and at the time they were known for cheating people out of their money and for favoring the hated Roman government. For these reasons tax collectors were despised by the Jews.
8 0
3 years ago
True/ False Global integration is the interdependence among the countries of the world
Gekata [30.6K]

Answer:

True

Looked it up "Global interdependence refers to worldwide mutual dependence between countries."

4 0
3 years ago
Edwards v. South Carolina protected people’s right to assemble and
Marina86 [1]

Answer:

express unpopular views in a peaceful way.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why is Elie Wiesel’s Night valuable to a historian?
Vesnalui [34]

Because It is an eyewitness account of the atrocities committed at concentration camps written by a former prisoner who experienced them firsthand.

8 0
3 years ago
If the amount of people contributes to the amount of GDP a country has what causes the amount that is used to turn against ones
LekaFEV [45]
Each persons group of people can contribute, then that means that they can be blamed for each cause one brings into a country.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • During the 1600s and 1700s, the fundamental goal of British mercantilism was to
    11·2 answers
  • These would be the duties that all citizens have; some are mandatory, like paying taxes and serving on juries; others are volunt
    5·2 answers
  • In response to public concern about downtown parking availability, a city's mayor appoints a panel of traffic engineers, transpo
    14·1 answer
  • Why did England want to establish colonies
    7·2 answers
  • Why do you think the catholic church had more influence in southern europe
    13·1 answer
  • What happens during the third step? The jurors discuss the case. The lawyers present the facts. The judge states the sentence. T
    6·2 answers
  • What checks and balances existed in Rome’s government
    7·1 answer
  • What does Dr. King say the nonviolent movement is offering?
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements is true allied forces bombed railroad lines saw the transport of Jews to concentration camps
    5·1 answer
  • Hey can someone help real quick I’m not sure of my answer
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!