1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Monica [59]
3 years ago
11

The Constitution of the United States protects the right to freedom of speech. According to the majority opinion offered from th

e case
Schenck vs United States, how did the Supreme Court decide that the right of freedom of speech is not absolute?

A) If the speech is symbolic in nature then it is not allowed.

B) If the speech creates a danger to the United States it is not allowed.

C) If the speech reflects negatively on someone's character then it is not
allowed.

D) If the speech exposes classified information from the United States then it
is not allowed.
History
1 answer:
evablogger [386]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: The answer is B.

Explanation: It because the court decided that even though the first amendment protects the freedom of speech, if the speech creates a danger to the United States then it can be restricted.

You might be interested in
Identify three documents on the timeline that are examples of social contract
Serggg [28]
So a social contract is where a "persons' moral and/or political obligations are dependent upon a contract or agreement among them to form the society in which they live".
Rousseau was most famous for coming up with the term but examples have always existed and exist right now.

An example of how a social contract works would be the legal system. For augments sake, if I say you stole all my money and you deny it, instead of fighting it out with fists or me raiding your house to find it with a gun, we both put our faith in the legal system which we both agree will be more impartial, and get to the truth. I surrender my right to take matters into my own hands on the condition that you will also do the same. Why did we do this? Because there are more benefits than not having this system in place. I may not be able to get personal revenge on you for stealing my money but I also am protected from people doing the same to me. People who are born in a state metaphorically "sign" the contract when they are born in order to live in the state.

A primitive example if you want would be that two people meet in the woods looking for berries. Both have guns and are distrustful of the other. They are constantly looking over their shoulders at each other out of fear which prevents them from going about their berry gathering. Eventually they both agree to a "contract" that they will both give up their guns at the same time. They do this because whilst you do not want to give up your gun, it means that you don't have to worry about getting shot in the back so times are more productive.
The theory is the same even if people disagree on why social contracts exist. Folk like Rousseau thought that social contracts arose because at the end of the day, humans are more interested in personal liberty and life and wish to avoid conflict as much as possible. More pessimistic people like Hobbes thought it was because humans are so naturally warlike that we needed social contracts to prevent our own violent natures.
6 0
2 years ago
PLSS HELP!! read below for the mentioned verses. ''Use your Bible and a concordance to find two additional verses (not mentioned
umka21 [38]

Answer:

1 John 4:8 - He that loveth not knoweth not God; for God is love.

Hebrews 13:8 - Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever.

2 Peter 3:9 - The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.

1 John 1:5 - This then is the message which we have heard of him, and declare unto you, that God is light, and in him is no darkness at all.

Psalms 30:5 - For his anger [endureth but] a moment; in his favour [is] life: weeping may endure for a night, but joy [cometh] in the morning.

Isaiah 40:28 - Hast thou not known? hast thou not heard, [that] the everlasting God, the LORD, the Creator of the ends of the earth, fainteth not, neither is weary? [there is] no searching of his understanding.

James 1:17 - Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and cometh down from the Father of lights, with whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning.

Galatians 5:22 - But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith,

Psalms 18:30 - [As for] God, his way [is] perfect: the word of the LORD is tried: he [is] a buckler to all those that trust in him.

John 14:26 - But the Comforter, [which is] the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.

John 14:6 - Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.

John 3:16 - For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

Isaiah 41:10 - Fear thou not; for I [am] with thee: be not dismayed; for I [am] thy God: I will strengthen thee; yea, I will help thee; yea, I will uphold thee with the right hand of my righteousness.

Psalms 103:1-22 - ([A Psalm] of David.) Bless the LORD, O my soul: and all that is within me, [bless] his holy name.

Explanation:

I don't know if you have any of these already but here are some!!

6 0
2 years ago
Which best states Justice Harry Blackmun’s position in Roe v. Wade?
Bumek [7]
<span>After thorough research, there exists the same question that has the following choices:

</span>A. The right to privacy has certain limits that must be recognized. 
<span>B. The welfare of the state is more important than personal privacy. </span>
<span>C. The government is able to deny certain rights if the need arises. </span>
<span>D. The government is permitted to regulate rights according to law.
</span><span>
The correct answer is letter D. </span><span>The government is permitted to regulate rights according to law.</span><span>

Roe v. Wade was the justice's most famous and controversial work on the recognition of making abortion constitutionally right.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Ac-Cent-Tchu-Ate The Positive Lyrics Johnny Merc.er
Mekhanik [1.2K]

For a sec looks like you sneezed typed

6 0
2 years ago
The electoral college is used to elect who?
kifflom [539]

Answer:

the president elect who later will not become president until january when the president elect is annogerated

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • what arguments might a conservationist use to justify president Roosevelt's expansion of the power of the federal government
    5·2 answers
  • How was the Judiciary Act of 1789 a compromise between Federalists and Anti-Federalists?
    5·2 answers
  • What were social limitations for african americans in 1865 to 1900?
    10·1 answer
  • What did Karl Marx blame for the transformation of most societies from being Gemeinschaft to Gesellschaft? the Protestant Reform
    5·1 answer
  • Can someone plzz<br><br><br> Write 1 paragraph based on Mesopotamia religion
    10·1 answer
  • 1.Which of these had the BIGGEST impact on the early part of the Cold War?
    11·2 answers
  • By the end of the war how many individuals been killed
    11·1 answer
  • Consider the oral histories documented in this passage. How you would feel if this experience happened to you?
    14·2 answers
  • How were the australians treated by the british
    14·2 answers
  • What led to the decline of child labor in the nineteen hundreds.<br><br> UwU
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!