Answer:
Option C.
Step-by-step explanation:
Consider the below figure attached with this question.
The below figure represents the enlargement of a trapezoid. It means both trapezoid are similar.
We know that the corresponding sides of similar figures are proportional.
On cross multiplication we get
Therefore, the correct option is C.
Answer:
a) point estimate is 30%
b) null and alternative hypothesis would be
: p=27%
: p>27%
c) We reject the null hypothesis, percentage working people aged 65-69 had increased
Step-by-step explanation:
<em>a. </em>
Point estimate would be the proportion of the working people aged 65–69 to the sample size and equals
ie 30%
<em>b.</em>
Let p be the proportion of people aged 65–69 who is working. OECD claims that percentage working had increased. Then null and alternative hypothesis would be
: p=27%
: p>27%
<em>c.</em>
z-score of the sample proportion assuming null hypothesis is:
where
- p(s) is the sample proportion of working people aged 65–69 (0.3)
- p is the proportion assumed under null hypothesis. (0.27)
- N is the sample size (600)
then z=
= 1.655
Since one tailed p value of 1.655 = 0.048 < 0.05, sample proportion is significantly different than the proportion assumed in null hypothesis. Therefore we reject the null hypothesis.
Answer:
240,000 AUD to USD = 161,924.79 US Dollars or 150,000 USD to AUD = 222,316.63 Australian Dollars
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The first picture's answer would be (6, 21)
Step-by-step explanation:
You have to find the points on the 8th and the 9th day, and then you would add them together, and then divide by two finding the average, which would be 24 and 18, so when added, you get 42, divided by 2 you get 21. You look on the graph for the point with 21, and you find it is on 6.
Step-by-step explanation:
As x decreases by 3, y decreases by 6.
When x = -3, y = -5.
When y = -2, x = -1.5
Hence y = 2x + 1.