1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
emmainna [20.7K]
3 years ago
15

Do you think African Americans would have been eager to fight for the United States during the Spanish American War? Why or why

no t?
History
1 answer:
Airida [17]3 years ago
4 0
No, generally speaking <span>African Americans would not have been eager to fight for the United States during the Spanish American War, since they were treated with such disrespect by white Americans, who started the war in the first place. </span>
You might be interested in
Why did the maya build pyramids
UkoKoshka [18]

Answer:

to honour the gods

Explanation:

because the pyramids were offering to the gods

3 0
2 years ago
Why did president wilson fail to maintain u.s?
nlexa [21]
<span>Because Wilson found it increasingly difficult to maintain U.S. neutrality after Germany, despite its promises in the Arabic pledge and the Sussex pledge, initiated a program of unrestricted submarine warfare early in 1917 that threatened U.S. commercial shipping.

hope this helped :)
alisa202</span>
3 0
3 years ago
English kings granted colonial charters. A charter is most similar to A. religious freedom B. a corporation C. a license D. merc
seropon [69]

Answer:

C. A license.

Explanation:

The king is basically giving them a license to start a colony. It's like how you can't drive a car unless you have a drivers license, but with colonies.

Hope this helps!

4 0
2 years ago
Please answer as soon as possible
AlekseyPX

Answer:

Explanation:

Spanish

800,000

need extra info

4 0
2 years ago
describe the different views between the Federalist and Anti-Federalist regarding the Constitution and its ratification. needs t
jasenka [17]
Antifederalist saw the Constitution as a way for the Federalist to gain more control over the states. This was seen as the opposite for the Federalist Party because they just wanted to create a central government that was strong enough to run the whole country. The Antifederalist Party was totally against the ratification because they were afraid that the national government would become too powerful and take advantage of their power. The Federalist Party was for the Constitution because they saw it as a way for the people to get more involved in the government since the most powerful branch would be directly linked to the people. Lastly, the Antifederalists saw the Constitution as a way to take the power of the states away while the Federalists interpreted the Constitution as a way for the states and the national government to have similar powers that still allow the national government to handle national affairs rather than having the states do it.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why was there a need for Reconstruction of the South?
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements is not true about the colony of
    6·1 answer
  • Place the steps in the production of an auditory sensation in order from start to finish. Information concerning the frequency a
    9·1 answer
  • This illustration of the 1873 anti-saloon demonstration shows that women- preferred to exercise free speech in private preferred
    9·1 answer
  • When did the battle take place seige of antwerp
    6·2 answers
  • HELPPPPPPPP ME PLEASEEEE
    13·1 answer
  • First african american with his own network radio show
    13·1 answer
  • Who was Clara Barton and what was her contribution to the Civil War?
    5·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP! 50 POINTS! <br> Who were the key leaders of the ancient Israelites?
    7·2 answers
  • Is the verb past, present, or
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!