Answer: Devshirma and slavery have both similarities and differences.
Explanation:
The Ottomans practiced Devshirma as a forcible abduction of Christian boys into the elite Ottoman army ranks. These boys were taken from their families and were enlisted in the elite Ottoman military ranks. Slavery, in itself, is a violent process of alienating people for forced labor. If we look at these definitions, they are similar in themselves. A slave could get his freedom in certain situations, but he always remained a slave during the service.
On the other hand, officials in the Ottoman Empire who found themselves in the state under the means of devshirme could advance in the service. There were many examples when people who became residents of the Ottoman Empire came to the country's highest positions. The Grand Ottoman Vizier Mehmed Pasha Sokolović had just arrived in the Ottoman capital, Constantinople, with a devshirme. He advanced so much in the service that after the sultan, he was the second man of the bulky Ottoman Empire. The very title of Grand Vizier in the empire implied that position.
Answer:
The economic effects are that various European and American powers became immensely wealthy and became even more powerful; the British drained and exploited all the wealth and riches of China for more than a few centuries alone—essentially enslavement.
India as well being a colonial territory of the British for also 200 years was exploited and made the British rich beyond imagination.
Other European and American powers did the same did all over Asia to every Asian country… the colonized countries of course suffered.
Explanation:
Answer:
b loyalty
Explanation:
samurai remaind loyal to there shogun and code untill death and knights remaind loyal to their king or comander
Answer:
The correct answer is A. The clear and present danger was adopted by the U.S. Supreme Court after it found the bad tendency test allowed government to punish too much harmless speech.
Explanation:
The rule of clear and present danger is a principle adopted as a standard that restricts freedom of speech and the press. It is a standard used when a court or related agency tries to suppress it with a suspension order, etc. in case it leaks or infringes on the honor or privacy of others. It was first used by Justice Holmes in the Schenck v. United States (1919).
This principle imposes restrictions on the media only if there is a current risk of direct harm, or if the act is intended to cause such harm.
Justice Holmes judged "degree and proximity." In other words, the requirements were assessed to be significant and clear risks (degrees) and clear or present (risk or present).
