1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Naily [24]
3 years ago
13

During World War I, conscientious objectors were used to support which of these? relief efforts in France ammunition production

training African American troops protecting U.S. merchant ships
History
1 answer:
Strike441 [17]3 years ago
6 0
During World War I, conscientious objectors were used to support "relief efforts in France," although this was not universally the case, and many remained at home.
You might be interested in
Why was west germany not a part of the original group of nato nations answer?
aleksklad [387]
Germany was occupied by USSR and us, Britain...
there were no government to join to any allies
4 0
3 years ago
Farmers wanted more money in circulation in the late 1800s
emmasim [6.3K]
Farmers wanted more money in circulation in the late 1800's (specifically 1888) because they wanted to inflate the value of the dollar. They believed that because the dollar was strong, the food would cost more and in turn they could also pay back their loans on an inflated dollar.
3 0
4 years ago
How do u wash a dog?
7nadin3 [17]
Put soap and scrub the fur so the germs go away.
8 0
3 years ago
1. Explain why Roosevelt asked Congress to abandon on the gold standard, and then later restored it. How did these decisions ref
k0ka [10]

The gold standard was used in the USA for two periods: 1879/1914 and 1925/33. When Roosevelt acceded to the government in March of 1933, Great Britain had already left the system (1931) due to the capital outflow. In the case of the US, although foreign devaluations had somewhat diminished their competitiveness, and 20% of gold reserves had leaked during the previous year, the stock of reserves had not decreased critically. Unlike England, which abandoned the gold standard due to flight of reserves, Roosevelt decided to do so to promote a general rise in prices through the devaluation of the dollar, trying to force the exit of the depression. That is why on 6/3/1933 he banned the banks from international gold (based dubiously on the Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917) and on 9/3/1933 (through the Emergency Banking Act) he nationalized the currencies and gold bullion as well as gold certificates held by banks, delivering trust money in exchange for the official parity of US $ 20.6 an ounce.

The market received full impact of the measures only on 4/20/1933, when the compulsory gold exchange was extended to individuals and non-financial companies. Then the dollar began to devalue quickly against gold. However, not satisfied with the market devaluation reached, on 12/5/1933 Roosevelt achieved a Joint Resolution of the Congress to begin a policy of buying gold in the international market (in the national had already captured everything), in order to exacerbate devaluation. The international price went from US $ 20.6 per ounce to US $ 35.

This presented a new problem: almost 60% of public and private long-term debt was indexed with the price of gold. If indexation is applied, debt services would increase from 5% of GDP to 20%, given the fall in output due to economic depression and the increase in the value of gold due to devaluation. Therefore, on 5/6/1933 a Joint Resolution of the Congress invalidated the golden clause of public and private contracts, qualifying it "against public policy" and rendering it retroactively not enforceable in the courts.

Only on 31/1/1934 the dollar was officially devalued in gold terms and the obligation to melt all bullion gold was established, limiting its existence to numismatic pieces. Only the possibility of freely trading in US off-shore gold monetary operations remained, a faculty that was finally revoked by J. F. Kennedy.

7 0
3 years ago
How dose this viewpoint represent manifest destiny.
bulgar [2K]

Answer:

Answer Below

Explanation:

How does this painting represent Manifest Destiny? this painting shows trains and people moving towards the west, following an angel that lights the way. this is manifest destiny because they're expanding America westward. ... there are animals moving west, trains moving west, an angel moving west, and farmers moving west.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who invaded northern India in the 1520s and established the Mughal dynasty? A. Ismail B. Babur C. Osman D. Suileyman
    7·2 answers
  • How could a cataract serve as a natural protective barrier
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes Spain's treatment of the Native Americans? A. Native Americans were paid very little to wo
    13·2 answers
  • Indentured servants work was
    13·1 answer
  • Europeans wanted to find new trade routes to bypass (go around) which group of traders?
    15·1 answer
  • After Black Codes were established in the South, unemployed African Americans
    14·1 answer
  • Which TWO statements describe the conditions experienced by U.S. farmers during the
    7·1 answer
  • Which sentence describes an achievement of Rome's Empire that survived its fall ​
    14·1 answer
  • Giving brainly if correct
    5·1 answer
  • Pa answer po plss asap​
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!