Answer:
Following are the solution to this question:
Explanation:
Only two adventurers that go to the forest to discover that nation are Ulrich or Georg Znaeym. Parents move deep into the woods but they're lost. They're still lost. We gradually lose power and fear overwhelms the trust. You're afraid in the dark and Ulrich unexpectedly notices something else in the dark. We were dogs, and they knew not who that was. Its conclusion isn't explicit and the writer allows this to be interpreted by the reader with its manner.
In 1919 Saki published the miscreants. It is a collection of short stories whose story focuses on tree travelers. The narrator has no clear climax mostly on the plot. Its ending is enough for the researcher to read out how they choose to end it. Typically, that's the writers' tactic to allow viewer and writers to tell their experience.
The answer for that is Personification
Answer:
D. The Body's Supercomputer: the Central Nervous System
Question 2
Answer: Across the bay, fleets of old fishing boats was seen on the horizon.
Explanation: The subject <em>fleets</em> (plural noun) <em>of old fishing boats </em>mismatches the verb <em>was seen </em>(only for I/he/she/it)
Question 5
Answer: John cried.
Explanation: This sentence is the only one with a subject and a predicate. "Because he wasn't hungry" is a reason clause that must depend on another sentence. "Rebekah drove a race car she won three races" is not a valid sentence unless you place a semicolon after the word "car" to separate the two predicates in it (or a period to make two separate sentences).
Question 10
Answer: I studied
Explanation: The subject "I" is not properly divided from the verb (studied), complement (for the test) and the independent clause joined by the word "but" (but I still didn't pass it).
Answer:
people will most likely be more lazy
Explanation:
because if there are more tv's there will be more people on the tv's so it will lead to less inclind to do anything or go outside
hope i helped brainly crown aprrcieted