B is the answer <span>B- the rate remains the same , even if income increases or decreases
</span>
Answer: 0.48
Explanation:
P(A/B) = P(AnB)/P(B) where:
P(A/B) = The probability of event A occurring given that B has occurred.
P(AnB) = The probability of both events A and B occurring.
P(B) = the probability that event B occurs.
So let
P(A) = Probability that the residents of a household own 2 cars.
P(B) = Probability that the annual household income is greater than $25,000.
The question tells us that
P(A/B) = 0.8
Note that: P(A) = 0.7, P(B) = 0.6.
Since we want to work out P(AnB), because it gives the probability that residents have an annual household income over $25,000 and own 2 cars.
We would Rearrange our initial equation to make P(AnB) the subject formula becoming;
P(A/B) = P(AnB)/P(B)
P(B)*P(A/B) = P(AnB)
So, inserting our probabilities into this equation gives:
0.6*0.8 = 0.48
Answer: The corrects answers are "C) the pressures of competition in the labor market" and A) will push wage rates toward the marginal revenue product of labor.".
Explanation: Because the correct and complete statement would be: Even when competitive companies cannot directly calculate the product of marginal income, the pressures of competition in the labor market will push wage rates towards the product of marginal income from labor.
Making it clear that the strong pressures that are the product of competition in the labor market pushed wage rates towards the product of marginal income.
Answer:
<em>Ratification by Principal One of the criteria for enactment is that all material truths involved in the transaction must be known to the Principal. Van Stavern was not aware of Hash's behaviour. </em>
He did not realize that somehow the steel is being shipped under his name, and that the shipments were being billed him directly. Unlike liability through obvious authority, approval by the principal is a positive act by which he or she acknowledges the agent's illegal actions.
Just a principal would ratify; thus, Van Stavern was not directly imputed to information by the invoices and checks signed by Van Stavern's workers.
The court stated that the use of corporate checks was further proof that Van Stavern regarded the expenditures as business, not private. So Van Stavern could not be held personally liable.
Remember that on Sutton Steel that's not excessively harsh. Sutton understood it was working with a building company and did not seek to get the personal approval of the contract from Van Stavern.
<em>Lawfully, Sutton's agreement in this case is called an unaccepted offer which can be withdrawn at any time.</em>
<em></em>
Some of the social factors that have led to unemployment in South Africa amongst the youth are:
- High population growth.
- High poverty rates.
As a result of high population growth, the number of youth in South Africa has increased to a point where getting jobs for all of them is quite difficult.
High poverty rates also mean that a lot of the youth are unable to afford a tertiary education which means that they are unable to get the qualifications needed for a job.
Find out more on factors leading to unemployment at brainly.com/question/305041.
