Should the government control social media? Why or why not?

English

2 answers:

Helen [10]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

In my opinion, no. Because that's a form that people can express themselves. Plus, the government probably won't let anything on there that they find offensive to them. So it kinda violates our freedom of speech. (hope this helps!!)

Marta_Voda [28]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Explanation:

The government should not control Social media as these are platforms not publishers. It gives an easy voice to the users who exhibit certain opinions out of their consciousness that should not be controlled. It could be censored or monitored to an extent that it does not violate laws or threaten other users.

Social media platforms are privately owned, with their own rules and regulations guaranteed by the government itself. They cannot be completely owned by government.

Censorship is politically motivated that aims to privatize or polarize the social media. Government's interference obstructs the production or consumption of the information.

Individual speech can be easily influenced by government's agendas. The right to free speech is violated due to the restriction imposed upon the users who are guaranteed free expression in the public sphere.

You might be interested in

1. PART A: Which statement describes the<br> central idea of the text?

Misha Larkins [42]

Answer:

The central ideas of a text are those that are most important. The rest of the text is built around these main ideas. Main ideas also tend to be supported by details which expand on their information and claims. Finally, main ideas can be either explicitly stated or implied, without altering their importance and relevance to the text

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Article "Is the American Dream Still Possible"

AlladinOne [14]

Answer:

1. He included that heading to encourage readers to be active citizens of their country by voting wisely during elections.

2. Its inclusion was successful because given the hard financial times, and the author's stressing of the most important needs of the citizens, readers would be motivated to choose good candidates with good policies.

Explanation:

The author David Wallechinsky, cited the hard times Americans have been facing and how difficult it is for them to meet up with daily living. The author's inclusion of the heading "What Can You Do?", highlighted the core issues which affected Americans, and these include; meeting up with the cost of dairy, drugs, gas, quality schools, and security.

He encouraged them to elect candidates that did not just make empty promises but who could actually deliver and make life easier for the populace. The statistics of the financial challenges would make readers take the information under this heading seriously.

7 0

3 years ago

How did dinosaurs extinct

Iteru [2.4K]

a comet struck and a chain of problems happened which wiped yhe dinosaurs out

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Read the excerpt from Eighty Years and More: Reminiscences, 1815-1897.

inessss [21]

Yes that was right is a

5 0

3 years ago

What effect does the speaker wish to achieve by repeating the words "we shall" before successive phrases?

FrozenT [24]

Repeating a sequence of words at the beginning of a phrase is called 'Anaphora' in rhetoric. It is used in speeches to give emphasis to the point being discussed. Thus, the speaker wanted to emphasize his point and encourage his listeners to do something as well.

7 0

3 years ago