Answer:
leo frank was an American factory superintendent who was convicted in 1913 of the murder of a 13 year old employee , Mary Phagan , in Atlanta , Georgia
I. Introduction
In the 1760s, Benjamin Rush, a native of Philadelphia, recounted a visit to Parliament. Upon seeing the king’s throne in the House of Lords, Rush said he “felt as if he walked on sacred ground” with “emotions that I cannot describe.”1 Throughout the eighteenth century, colonists had developed significant emotional ties with both the British monarchy and the British constitution. The British North American colonists had just helped to win a world war and most, like Rush, had never been more proud to be British. And yet, in a little over a decade, those same colonists would declare their independence and break away from the British Empire. Seen from 1763, nothing would have seemed as improbable as the American Revolution.
The Revolution built institutions and codified the language and ideas that still define Americans’ image of themselves. Moreover, revolutionaries justified their new nation with radical new ideals that changed the course of history and sparked a global “age of revolution.” But the Revolution was as paradoxical as it was unpredictable. A revolution fought in the name of liberty allowed slavery to persist. Resistance to centralized authority tied disparate colonies ever closer together under new governments. The revolution created politicians eager to foster republican selflessness and protect the public good but also encouraged individual self-interest and personal gain. The “founding fathers” instigated and fought a revolution to secure independence from Britain, but they did not fight that revolution to create a “democracy.” To successfully rebel against Britain, however, required more than a few dozen “founding fathers.” Common colonists joined the fight, unleashing popular forces that shaped the Revolution itself, often in ways not welcomed by elite leaders. But once unleashed, these popular forces continued to shape the new nation and indeed the rest of American history.
http://www.americanyawp.com/text/05-the-american-revolution/
Jefferson's quote will be an example of propaganda if it influences the reader to agree with a statement, without using evidence, but using persuasive, sentimental, and manipulative elements.
<h3>What is propaganda?</h3>
- It is a form of persuasion.
- It is the ability to convince people to support opinions, beliefs, and precepts.
Propaganda is a way of manipulating the public to support a particular speaker. This speaker presents a statement, without showing logical evidence that proves why that statement is correct and reliable.
However, this speaker uses emotional, religious, psychological, or any other element capable of manipulating the audience dishonestly.
An example of this can be seen in a person who claims that vaccines cause disease because God did not show in the Holy Bible that people should be vaccinated. This person did not use scientific evidence to confirm his claim but used religious elements to manipulate a Christian audience into supporting him.
Unfortunately, you didn't show which Jefferson quote your question refers to. This left your question incomplete and it was not possible to find the complete version of it, which prevents me from providing an objective answer. However, I hope this information will help you find that answer.
Learn more about propaganda:
brainly.com/question/21860449
#SPJ1
Answer:
The Continental Congress was a newly formed collective of democracy, meaning that control over a wide-expanse of resources such as Food support, and the drafting of personnel for the army were not yet automatic.
Explanation:
