Answer: Legal- rational Leadership style
Explanation:
The rational-legal style also known as transactional leadership is when a leader exercises control and authority on the basis of his knowledge to his subordinates.
Transactional leader is someone who values order and structure based on rules and regulations to complete task on time. Transactional leaders do not encourage personal creativity and innovative ideas because They depend on people who work well in a structured, directed environment ruled by influence and control.
Their main focus is on RESULTS, conformity to the existing structure of an organization and measures success based on the organization’s system of rewards and penalties. This type of leader is responsible for maintaining routine by managing and monitoring individual and group performance.
This type of leader sets the criteria for their workers according to existing defined requirements. Performance reviews are the most common way to judge employee performance.
Transactional leaders differ from other leaders like the charismatic and transformational leaders in that it is only results oriented.
In a nut shell, the legal rational Leadership style focuses on the give and take style based on controlling the performance of the individual and determining how well he or she can deliver in a structured environment.
We can then infer that the boss follows the legal-rational leadership style.
President Johnson initiated many programmes to help end poverty among the United States. Within them, one of the ideas was to create jobs and the other one was to simplify gaining higher education level for youths. President Johnson initiated also Social Security Act (1965), The Economic Opportunity Act (1964) and Food Stamp Act (1964).
Answer:
A
Explanation:
the would be US citizens because they were born in the United States and they get to travail with a pass port
Answer:
Charlemagne/Charles |
Explanation:
He was one of the greatest leaders in the middle ages.
I would say upper class. Both parents seem to have high paying jobs and in my mind wouldn't struggle to provide for their children's educational needs. Where as if they were upper-middle class they might struggle to pay for private schools and college.
