On the other hand, the Americans had many intangible advantages. The British fought a war far from home. Military orders, troops, and supplies sometimes took months to reach their destinations. ... They had to persuade the Americans to give up their claims of independence.
points aree listed below:
Answer:
5points
Explanation:
-Britain's were more powerful in arms and ammunition and army wise. so they had military supremacy
-bristish had captured multiple countries of the world and had set up their colnies there.
The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by the question is the second choice "He let his party campaign for him."
In 1860<span>, </span>Lincoln<span> won the party's </span>presidential<span> nomination. In the November </span>1860 election<span>, </span>Lincoln<span> again faced Douglas, who represented the Northern faction of a heavily divided Democratic Party, as well as Breckinridge and Bell.</span>
I hope my answer has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead!
The nullification crisis was a dispute over the power of the states to reject unconstitutional federal laws.
Here is information for both sides
Martin Luther King Jr.
One might want to be part of Martin Luther King Junior's movement because he was an advocate of nonviolence. King felt that violence only caused more problems and would allow for white citizens to continue to perceive African-Americans as hostile and unworth of equal treatment in America. This is why King would go on to organize several peaceful protests including marches, sit-ins, and boycotts. All of these can be seen as effective as they helped to get rid of racist policies and laws within the United States.
Malcolm X
One might want to be part of Malcolm X's movement because he is an advocate for standing up for oneself. Malcolm X refuses to be physically harrassed or hurt by white citizens who are trying to take away his rights. This refusal to back down shows courage and can result in change in the way people view African-American citizens.