1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
abruzzese [7]
3 years ago
13

The federal government currently levies a 15.3 percent payroll tax (7.65 percent on both the employer and employee) on the wages

of all workers. If the demand for laboris relatively elasti when compared to the inelastic supply of labor, the burden of this tax will a. be divided equally between employees and employers b. Its impossible to tell from this information c. fall primarily on employees d.tall primarily on employers.
Business
2 answers:
Lynna [10]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

c. fall primarily on employees

Explanation:

As the demand for labor is elasticc (if the business is not profitable will close) while the supply of labor more inelastic (worker had to work to sustain their living standards) the burden of taxation while in fact is assumed to be distributed equally what occurs is that labor is decrease to make the total cost (base wage plus taxes) the amount the employeer are willing to pay for the employee

bija089 [108]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

C) fall primarily on employees

Explanation:

The cost of taxes is always shared equally between suppliers and sellers, since it increases the price paid by the buyers and decreases the money received by the suppliers. But that doesn't mean that both sides are hurt equally.

Generally the side whose price elasticity is more inelastic, will suffer the most from taxes. In this case, the suppliers of labor are households, while the consumers of labor are the businesses. Since the price elasticity of supply is lower (elastic), then that means that the suppliers will suffer the most.

Since the bargaining power of businesses is much greater than the bargaining power of workers, they have the advantage of setting the terms of employment. Unless there is a shortage of employment (excess demand), businesses will always set terms that favor them over the workers. So even though the taxes will be paid by both, workers and businesses, the businesses will simply lower the wages to compensate for their higher costs.

You might be interested in
Maggie's Muffins, Inc., generated $2,000,000 in sales during 2015, and its year-end total assets were $1,400,000. Also, at year-
Ksenya-84 [330]

Answer:

The Sales will increase by $350,000 (2000,000 * 17.5%)

Explanation:

As we know that,

Self Supporting Growth Rate = Return on Equity * (1 - Payout Ratio) ...Eq1

Here

Payout ratio given is 50%

and

Return on Equity =  35% <u>(Step 1)</u>

By putting values in Eq1, we have:

Self Supporting Growth Rate = 35% * (1 - 50%)

Self Supporting Growth Rate = 17.5%

Which means that Sales will increase by $350,000 (2000,000 * 17.5%) which is 17.5%.

<u>Step 1: Find Return on Equity</u>

We know that:

Return on Equity = Net Income / Equity ..............Eq2

As we are not given value of Net Income we can not calculate the value of return on equity. But there is another way that we can calculate by simply multiplying and dividing by sales on Left hand side of the Eq2 equation.

Return on Equity = Net Income / Equity          * Sales / Sales

By rearranging, we have:

Return on Equity = Net Income / Sales  *   Sales / Equity

Now here,

Net Income / Sales  = Profit Margin

By putting this in the above equation, we have:

Return on Equity = Profit Margin  * Sales / Equity

Here

Profit Margin is 7% given in the question.

Sales were $2,000,000

And  

Equity is $400,000 <u>(Step 2)</u>

By putting values, we have:

Return on Equity = 7%  * $2,000,000 / $400,000

Return on Equity = <u>35%</u>

<u>Step 2. Find Equity</u>

Equity = Assets - Liabilities

Here,

Assets are worth $1,400,000

Liabilities are standing at $1,000,000 which includes only current liabilities because company doesn't have any long term borrowings

By putting the values, we have:

Equity = $1,400,000 - $1,000,000 = <u>$400,000</u>

<u>Brother, don't forget to rate the answer.</u>

5 0
3 years ago
Determine whether the following statement is true or false, and explain your reasoning:
Triss [41]

Answer:

The statement is true

Explanation:

As a fact, I agree that with large sample sizes, even the small differences between the null value and the observed point estimate can be statistically significant.

To put it differently, any differences between the null value and the observed point estimate will be material and/or significant if the samples are large in shape and form.

It's also established that point estimate get more clearer and understandable, and the difference between the mean and the null value can be easily singled out if the sample size is bigger.

Suffix to say, however, while the difference may connote a statistical importance, the practical implication notwithstanding, will be looked and studied on a different set of rules and procedures, beyond the statistical relevance.

6 0
3 years ago
Which situation is better for saving money in a CD (certificate of deposit): the purchasing a car or for use in an emergency? Ex
erica [24]

Answer:

Emergency

Explanation:

Always have extra money for problems that arise.

4 0
3 years ago
Documents of Trade
BlackZzzverrR [31]

Answer:

Here's ur answer

Explanation:

  • letter of enquiry
  • Quotation
  • receipt
  • order
  • delivery note
  • credit note

Hope it's helpful.. if so mark me as brainlist n thank me also

7 0
3 years ago
Market failures : a) are only a concern when they result in prices that are too high. b) apply exclusively to situations where p
ZanzabumX [31]

Answer:

d) result in overproduction or underproduction of a good.

Explanation:

Market failure occurs when market forces fails to allocate goods and services efficiently.

The government usually intervenes to correct market failure.

Externalities usually lead to market failure.

Positive externality is when the benefits of economic activities to third parties exceeds its cost. Research and development usually yield postive externality.

Goods that yield postive externality are usually underproduced. Government can intervene by giving subsidies and grants which encourages production.

A negative externality is when the cost of economic activities to third parties exceeds the benefit. Pollution is an example of negative externality. Goods that yield negative externality are usually overproduced. Government can intervene by taxing companies producing negative externality. This would increase the cost of production and discourage production.

I hope my answer helps you

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A company’s past experience indicates that 60% of its credit sales are collected in the month of sale, 30% in the next month, an
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following methods is a mathematical technique used for finding the best location for a single distribution point th
    12·1 answer
  • The wacc is used to _______ the expected cash flows when the firm has _______.
    5·1 answer
  • The labor-force participation rate tells us the fraction of the population that has chosen to participate in the labor market.
    6·1 answer
  • Lower inventory levels Group of answer choices make processes less dependent on each other while revealing bottlenecks more quic
    11·1 answer
  • Which stage of group development involves members introducing themselves to each other?
    12·1 answer
  • Why is eskom not a profitable company
    9·1 answer
  • Initech has 7 million shares of common stock outstanding and 50,000 bonds outstanding. The bonds pay semi-annual coupons at an a
    14·1 answer
  • At the end of 2003, Ritzcar Co. fails to accrue sales commissions earned during 2003, but paid in 2004. The error is not repeate
    12·1 answer
  • When conducting an independent audit the accountant is to evaluate a company's financial statements and?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!