1. eliminating some diseases
2. improving certain species (like growing bigger apples)
I think more food insecurity, coz if the population increases, then it will be problematic for people to access food, coz there would be competition and extreme food shortage. If they cant access food, then this will cause malnutrition and exacerbate poverty i guess. There would be civil terrorism and environment and sustainability concerns, such as pollution. It would also be detrimental to peoples health as diseases will be introduced. I hope i helped:) (these questions can be difficult, however if u make a domino effect like flow chart, then it can be pretty easy for you to develop and justify ur answer)
With a light microscope one can view the nucleus and endoplasmic reticulum, large vacuoles etc
The resolution of a light microscope is dependent on the wavelength of light that is the main beam of illumination. Light has approximately 0.4 um (UV)- 0.7um (Infrared) wavelength. Organelles smaller than about 0.5 um will be difficult to discern with a light microscope.
With an electron microscope one can view, in addition, even the ribosomes and mitochondria, chromosomes, tubules etc.
An electron microscope can discern very minute details of a cell. This is because its resolution is dependent on the very small wavelength of a beam of electrons which is approximately 0.002 um (about 10,000 times powerful than a light microscope)
B. their fuction is a result of their shape and folding
