1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nana76 [90]
3 years ago
15

What do you think Jessica? is this punctuated correctley

English
2 answers:
MA_775_DIABLO [31]3 years ago
7 0

Be more specific, I cannot understand that.

iogann1982 [59]3 years ago
4 0
I dont know who Jessica is but she sounds nice :D
You might be interested in
Matcn une deninition to the term.
musickatia [10]

Answer:

a person place or thing

4 0
2 years ago
What letter should replace the question mark?<br> A, D, F, ?, K, N, P
Marrrta [24]
1,4,6,?,11,14,16
the difference is going
3,2,?,?,3,2
therefore it should be
8 0
3 years ago
Which effect does Douglass use of first person pronoun such as I, me and mine have on many readers?
777dan777 [17]
The best answer would be a. it creates a personal connection between douglas and readers

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Kalani and lael are students who have been comparing the total kinetic energy of an iceberg to an ice cube
Nitella [24]

Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:

Kalani and lael are students who have been comparing the total kinetic energy of an iceberg to an ice cube

Kalani’s Argument:  My claim is that an iceberg has more total kinetic energy (thermal energy) than an ice cube. This is because even though an iceberg is about the same temperature as an ice cube, it is also much larger, so it is made of a lot more molecules. For this reason, an iceberg will have more total kinetic energy (thermal energy) than an ice cube.

Lael's Argument: An iceberg has more total kinetic energy (thermal energy) than an ice cube because it is larger and made of more molecules. This matters because molecules move, and moving things have kinetic energy, so each molecule adds its kinetic energy to the total. Since the iceberg and the ice cube are around the same temperature, the fact that the iceberg has extra molecules means that it will have more total kinetic energy (thermal energy).

Which argument is more convincing?

Answer:

Kalani's argument is more convincing.

Explanation:

Lael says that the fact that Icebrg has extra molecules means that it has greater kinetic energy and this is not true, since the kinetic energy is greater in bodies and objects that have greater speed. In addition, speed increases as a body has greater mass. In this case, we can consider Kalani's argument as more convincing, since she related the kinetic energy to the mass of the iceberg.

7 0
2 years ago
Which statement about colons is correct?
BartSMP [9]
Last one (d) the others dont even make sense

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Complete the pattern what is the reasoning 6,500,000 and 65,000 and 6,500 and 6.5 and 0.65
    6·1 answer
  • What does ballad mean
    9·2 answers
  • The possibility for dramatic action between characters was created when Aeschylus added _____.
    13·2 answers
  • Who is the real master in the story the people could fly
    8·2 answers
  • Which word best describes the London setting in "Stave I: Marley's Ghost"?
    13·1 answer
  • Question 12 of 24
    7·2 answers
  • Because the lost hiker had had no protection from the sun and wind, he was suffering 4 points
    15·1 answer
  • What’s your favourite type of media and why?
    15·1 answer
  • Write an article suitable for publication in a school magazine on : The effect of Bullying in detail
    7·1 answer
  • Name and explain FIVE accessories which can be used when dressing​
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!