So that the audience isn’t confused on the authors purpose. With a smaller area it leaves not much confusion and allows the reader to know what he/her is reading.
The correct answer is D. because it gives no indication of a place
Then suddenly the singer threw up his face, straightened his tubby figure, rose upon his tiptoes, and with wagging head and scarlet cheeks emitted such a howl as the same dog might have given had his growl been checked by a kick from his master.
Every Greek was a trained critic, and as unsparing in his hisses as he was lavish in his applause.
Many a singer far better than this absurd fop had been driven amid execration and abuse from the platform.
<h3>Explain your answer briefly?</h3>
In these three lines, we can see that the tone is a mocking one. In the first sentence, the singer's singing is compared to a dog's howl when being kicked. This implies that the singing was not pleasant in any way. In the second sentence, the author tells us that the audience disliked the singing just as much, being "unsparing in their hisses.
Thus," Finally, we learn that the author refers to the singer as an "absurd fop."
To learn more about The Contest click here:
brainly.com/question/11968462
#SPJ1
I think the common noun is family and circus.
From the data provided in the given passage it can be concluded that-The study that shows that African Wild Dogs catch about sixteen percent of their prey and do not use teamwork in hunting is true.
According to books, papers and television shows who created an ultimate predator image of African Wild Dogs, the dogs' coordinated teamwork and their unusual endurance helped them catch about eighty percent of their prey.
But this idea was challenged when there was a study conducted in 2012 to justify the clarity of the notion.
In the study, researchers had fit a pack of wild dogs with special collars that recorded the dogs' positions and speeds. The data collected by the collars gave the researchers a window into the activities that the dogs engaged in when they weren't being watched. The outcomes were a startling contrast to how viciously known the dogs were.
The dogs never used teamwork in their hunts rather they chased their prey over short distances as opposed to long runs. So instead of eighty percent, they brought down only about sixteen percent of their prey.
So, the main idea of the passage is clarification and modification of already recorded events and bringing out the main truth about African Wild Dogs.
Learn more about African Wild Dogs here-
brainly.com/question/1327820
#SPJ9
