1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
never [62]
3 years ago
15

Why did organized labor become more militant in the 1930s? How did the Wagner Act help? In what industries did unions make espec

ially significant gains?
History
1 answer:
kherson [118]3 years ago
5 0

They demanded better working conditions and benefits.  Before, workers labored in dangerous and unfair conditions. The Wagner Act gave unions an opportunity to organize themselves and demand reforms.  This help increase the power of unions when it comes to demanding and negotiating for better deals with management.

You might be interested in
How did the united states surprise other delegates at the washington naval conference in 1921
Sidana [21]
He Washington Naval Conference, also named the Washington Arms Conference or the Washington Disarmament Conference
8 0
3 years ago
What was one result of the events listed in the timeline
Lorico [155]
January 16-17, 1991
<span>United Nations coalition forces launch Operation Desert Storm when Saddam Hussein refuses to withdraw from Kuwait.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
When was the declaration of independence made​
Andrej [43]

Answer:

July 2, 1776

Explanation:

On July 2, 1776, Congress voted to declare independence. Two days later, it ratified the text of the Declaration. John Dunlap, official printer to Congress, worked through the night to set the Declaration in type and print approximately 200 copies. These copies, known as the Dunlap Broadsides, were sent to various committees, assemblies, and commanders of the Continental troops. The Dunlap Broadsides weren’t signed, but John Hancock’s name appears in large type at the bottom. One copy crossed the Atlantic, reaching King George III months later. The official British response scolded the “misguided Americans” and “their extravagant and inadmissable Claim of Independency”.

Hope this helps! Please mark brainliest

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of these is not something soldiers were expected to do when they were not fighting or migrating to another location?
seraphim [82]

<em> A.) Improving Roman infrastructures.</em>

<em>When they were moving to another location Roman soldiers did not have to improve on other Roman infrastructures they came upon along the way, because the building of the infrastructures was not organized by the Roman troops, more so they were organized by an architect and the architect's workers.</em>

<em>The reason I also chose A was because the Roman troops traveled in their groups and whenever they were injured it was up to them to man the camp hospitals to heal the wounded. Also recruiting more soldiers along the way was also very helpful to the Roman legion and allowed a much broader amount of soldiers that could be used for taking over land. Not to mention that soldiers (traveling strictly inside their troops) were responsible for feeding themselves (what I'm saying is that the troops were responsible for cooking and feeding each other I just used "themselves" as the word to describe it).</em>

<em>Since Roman soldiers traveled in groups they did not (I'm assuming here I don't know for sure) take women or other people along with them and they only took the amount of soldiers that were assigned by their higher ups. In other words Roman soldiers were really only expected to do as they were ordered to (in modern times any disobedience to what they were ordered to do would have resulted in them having it put on a disaplinary record, but they did not do that sort of thing during Roman times meaning that they punished the soldiers in ways that I don't factually now about). Basically the key importance in the Roman soldier was to carry out the order he received and complete the order quickly and efficiently. However, they did recruit soldiers along the way as they were instructed and that was to help them benefit for taking over land. The commanding officer was the one who told the Roman soldiers what to do when they were traveling (simple tasks, not the task assigned by the current ruler) and the soldiers were expected to complete it. A few of the tasks assigned by the commanding officer could have been to cook, preform healing measures, and recruit more soldiers.</em>

<em>Hope this helps.</em>

<em>-Northstar</em>

5 0
2 years ago
I’ll give out brainliest please
harina [27]
So are u :)))))))))))
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did the depression affect the work force
    14·1 answer
  • Most African kings obtained slaves for sale by
    14·2 answers
  • Which statement explains the difference between iambic pentameter and prose best
    7·1 answer
  • Why were early factories located in the north
    12·1 answer
  • In which one of the following countries were U.S. Marines killed as part of a peacekeeping force?
    11·2 answers
  • 4 drawbacks to JFK's nomination and explain how he turned each into an asset.
    9·1 answer
  • What were the four questions posed by the White Citizens Council to candidates for public office?
    8·1 answer
  • Write a short poem using at least 4 of Shakespeare's phrases.
    9·2 answers
  • Why did Goldin have people cheer whenever they made a mistake?
    5·1 answer
  • How did Hitler become popular as a political leader?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!