Early Greek philosopher Anixamander (ca. 610 – 545 BC) was a monist. That means he believed that ultimately there is just one sort of substance underlying all the different things we see in the physical universe. He put forth the idea that this single underlying substance of all things is something beyond our experience. He called it the ἄπειρον (<em>apeiron</em>), which means "the boundless" or "the limitless." Anaximander was reacting to the views of Thales, a previous thinker from his same town, Miletus, who had suggested that there was one underlying substance to all things, and that <u>water</u> was that essential element. Anaximander objected to Thales' thought, because water is something we all see and experience readily in the perceived world. He believed any underlying or base-level substance, from which water and any other physical stuff originated, had to be something beyond the boundaries of our present experience, or "the boundless."
One evaluation of Anaximander's views came from another Milesian philosopher who followed him: Anaximenes. Anaximenes saw the theory of Anaximander as dodging the question, "What is the main ingredient of all things in the universe." By saying, "It's boundless; it's something we don't know," had he really answered anything? So Anaximenes dismissed the view of Anaximander ... but didn't agree with Thales either. Anaximenes proposed that air was the underlying element of all physical phenomena.
You'll have to decide for yourself what you think of Anaximander's "boundless" theory.
Prince Henry<span> (Henrique) the Navigator (1394-1460) was a Portuguese royal </span>prince<span>, soldier, and patron of explorers. </span>Henry<span> sent many sailing expeditions down Africa's west coast, but did not go on them himself. ... The flag of Portugal during </span>Prince Henry's<span> life.</span>
Answer:
Among the options given on the question the correct answer is option O.
All of the above
Explanation: There were a series of wars between the colonial force and the native Americans which were mainly Indians.Even after the independence of the America from British there was a war between Indians and whites. After, independence the federal government took some policy Indians which were not pleasant for them, which led a bloody war between the Indians and white troops.
The duration of the war was long. But the in the long run the Indians were defeated. There were some reasons for the defeat of Indians. The buffalo soldiers were an important part of the war. They were the strength of the Indians warriors. But the decrease of their number became a reason of their defeat.
On the other hand, the white soldiers had advanced military technology like as guns, canons etc. But Indians did not have enough modern weapon to fight against the white soldiers.
Moreover, the number of Indians were less than white Americans. As a result they were outnumbered.
Therefore, all these factors led the defeat of Plains Indians.
Answer:
<em>The </em><em>print </em><em>industry </em><em>was </em><em> </em><em>during </em><em>the </em><em>glided </em><em>age </em><em>because </em><em>of </em><em>the </em><em>unstable </em><em>and </em><em>fragile </em><em>notions </em><em>unity </em><em>among </em><em>the </em><em>thirteen </em><em>American</em><em> </em><em>colonies,</em><em>the </em><em>print</em><em> </em><em>acted </em><em>as </em><em>a </em><em>blinding</em><em> </em><em>agent </em><em>that </em><em>mitigated </em><em>the </em><em>chances</em><em> </em><em>that </em><em>the </em><em>colonies</em><em> </em><em>would </em><em>not </em><em>support</em><em> </em><em>one </em><em>another </em><em>when </em><em>war </em><em>with </em><em>Britain </em><em>broke </em><em>out </em><em>on </em><em>1</em><em>7</em><em>7</em><em>5</em>
