Can you shorten the question a little bit shorter please if you can.
1) When the media acts as a cornerstone for a particular political point of view.
3) When the media shows the source of information rather than the validity of it.
4) When the media presents a complex subject without explaining it
5) When the media fails to present an article about an important issue (
<span>6) When the media falsely presents information </span>
Answer:
prevalence → verb → to prevail
potentially → noun → potential
vulnerable → noun → vulnerability
accessible → verb → to access
censorship → adverb → censorious
volunteer → adjective → voluntary
dubious → noun → dubiousness
system → adjective → systematic
regular → verb → to regulate
suitability → verb → to suit
Explanation:
In the English language, especially when it comes to words originated from Latin, it is common to change words with the addition or removal of certain parts -- the affixes. Notice, for example, that to transform "vulnerable" into a noun, we added a suffix (an ending): "vulnerability". On the other hand, to transform "censorship" into an adverb, we changed suffixes: "censorious". It is important to know and understand the use of affixes. They are a helpful means to figure out the meanings of new words.
Synthesize earlier information. A conclusion restates information that was introduced earlier and sums up what was said.
This question is called analogy, the comparison of two things or how they are related, im not sure with my answer but im really want to help you though so here are my answers:
21. C. provocative: dull
22. A. scholar: encyclopedia
23. D. literal:figurative
24. A. olfactory:sight
25. B. re: again
