1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Verizon [17]
3 years ago
15

the british economic system of _______ that views economic success in terms of Roman across the British government to view its c

olonies only as a way to gain wealth
History
1 answer:
Katarina [22]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

mercantilism

Explanation:

You might be interested in
ILL MARK BRAINLEST
Mama L [17]

Answer:

Appeasement : the action of satisfying the demands of an aggressive person, country, or organization: a policy of appeasement.

Explanation:

Why did England and France choose this path? : The main reason why Britain/England and France embraced the appeasement policy was because they did not want the whole of Europe to be dragged into a world war by Hitler. It was a policy being persued due to the lessons learnt from world war one.

Why didn't it work on Hitler? : Essentially the Policy of Appeasement did not succeed with the nations it was designed to protect: it failed to prevent war. The failure of the Policy was largely deemed on that Appeasement was misconceived; Hitler’s ambitions to increase Germany’s borders and to expand Lebensraum, stretched much further than the legitimate grievances of Versailles.

3 0
3 years ago
What was the impact and/or relationship between Jim Crow laws / Jim Crow Era and the
lina2011 [118]

Answer:

In September 1895, Booker T. Washington, the head of the Tuskegee Institute in Alabama, stepped to the podium at the Atlanta Cotton States Exposition and implored white employers to “cast down your bucket where you are” and hire African Americans who had proven their loyalty even throughout the South’s darkest hours. In return, Washington declared, southerners would be able to enjoy the fruits of a docile work force that would not agitate for full civil rights. Instead, blacks would be “In all things that are purely social . . . as separate as the fingers.”

Washington called for an accommodation to southern practices of racial segregation in the hope that blacks would be allowed a measure of economic freedom and then, eventually, social and political equality. For other prominent blacks, like W. E. B. Du Bois who had just received his PhD from Harvard, this was an unacceptable strategy since the only way they felt that blacks would be able to improve their social standing would be to assimilate and demand full citizenship rights immediately.

Regardless of which strategy one selected, it was clear that the stakes were extremely high. In the thirty years since the Civil War ended African Americans had experienced startling changes to their life opportunities. Emancipation was celebrated, of course, but that was followed by an intense debate about the terms of black freedom: who could buy or sell property, get married, own firearms, vote, set the terms of employment, receive an education, travel freely, etc. Just as quickly as real opportunities seemed to appear with the arrival of Reconstruction, when black men secured unprecedented political rights in the South, they were gone when northern armies left in 1877 and the era of Redemption began. These were the years when white Southerners returned to political and economic power, vowing to “redeem” themselves and the South they felt had been lost. Part of the logic of Redemption revolved around controlling black bodies and black social, economic, and political opportunities. Much of this control took the form of so-called Jim Crow laws—a wide-ranging set of local and state statutes that, collectively, declared that the races must be segregated.

In 1896, the year after Washington’s Atlanta Cotton Exposition speech, the Supreme Court declared in Plessy v. Ferguson that racial segregation was constitutional. It would take fifty-eight years for that decision to be reversed (in Brown v. Board of Education). In the meantime, African Americans had to negotiate the terms of their existence through political agitation, group organizing, cultural celebration, and small acts of resistance. Much of this negotiation can be seen in the history of the Great Migration, that period when blacks began to move, generally speaking, from the rural South to the urban North. In the process, African Americans changed the terms upon which they exercised their claims to citizenship and rights as citizens.

There are at least two factual aspects of the Great Migration that are important to know from the start: 1) the black migration generally occurred between 1905 and 1930 although it has no concrete beginning or end and 2) from the standpoint of sheer numbers, the Great Migration was dwarfed by a second migration in the 1940s and early 1950s, when blacks became a majority urban population for the first time in history. Despite these caveats, the Great Migration remains important in part because it marked a fundamental shift in African American consciousness. As such, the Great Migration needs to be understood as a deeply political act.

Migration was political in that it often reflected African American refusal to abide by southern social practices any longer. Opportunities for southern blacks to vote or hold office essentially disappeared with the rise of Redemption, job instability only increased in the early twentieth century, the quality of housing and education remained poor at best, and there remained the ever-looming threat of lynch law if a black person failed to abide by local social conventions. Lacking even the most basic ability to protect their own or their children’s bodies, blacks simply left.

3 0
3 years ago
In order to balance out the addition of California as a free state and appease the South, the ___________________ Act was signed
iVinArrow [24]
Missouri Compromise
7 0
3 years ago
What created an ineffective government system in the United States
mina [271]
The Articles of Confederation created an ineffective government system in the United States.
5 0
3 years ago
Which is the BEST description of Florida's stance during the American Revolution?
const2013 [10]

Answer:

West Florida took the side of the Loyalists; while East Florida strongly

supported the Patriots.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What two countries in Asia had the most deaths during ww2
    6·1 answer
  • Which sentence of the text highlights the southern states beliefs on the value of slavery
    11·1 answer
  • What was holocaust ? What type of government was in a effect in Germany at the time of Holocaust
    12·2 answers
  • English bill of rights- how it affected creation of us gov
    11·1 answer
  • Why is stated are in control a weakness for the government
    13·1 answer
  • Explain ONE way that trade in the Indian Ocean in the period 1200-1450 led to political change
    8·1 answer
  • why did the stamp act congress say it was ok for colonial legislatures to tax the colonist but not parliament?​
    5·1 answer
  • What social injustice happened to George Washington Carver when he was 6 years old?
    8·1 answer
  • What quote did the commander of the patriots at breeds hill say​
    13·2 answers
  • Your text outlines three practices to help us avoid ethical traps: slow down, remember your life principles, and
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!