Answer:
C.
Explanation: When they wrote the constitution, they had in mind a free democracy, that no matter whether you came from a rich or poor family, you could run for presidency or seats in the senate, and that the PEOPLE voted for or against laws, not a dictator making and destroying laws as he pleased.
Answer: There were many consequences of slavery that have left lasting effects on people, and societies. Societies that sold slaves were impacted by the decisions to sell them, such as the Kingdom of Kongo, how their society was weakened by the greed, and need to keep up with the demand of slave trading.
Explanation:
Answer: “Birth of a Nation”—D. W. Griffith’s disgustingly racist yet titanically original 1915 feature—back to the fore. The movie, set mainly in a South Carolina town before and after the Civil War, depicts slavery in a halcyon light, presents blacks as good for little but subservient labor, and shows them, during Reconstruction, to have been goaded by the Radical Republicans into asserting an abusive dominion over Southern whites. It depicts freedmen as interested, above all, in intermarriage, indulging in legally sanctioned excess and vengeful violence mainly to coerce white women into sexual relations. It shows Southern whites forming the Ku Klux Klan to defend themselves against such abominations and to spur the “Aryan” cause overall. The movie asserts that the white-sheet-clad death squad served justice summarily and that, by denying blacks the right to vote and keeping them generally apart and subordinate, it restored order and civilization to the South.
“Birth of a Nation,” which runs more than three hours, was sold as a sensation and became one; it was shown at gala screenings, with expensive tickets. It was also the subject of protest by civil-rights organizations and critiques by clergymen and editorialists, and for good reason: “Birth of a Nation” proved horrifically effective at sparking violence against blacks in many cities. Given these circumstances, it’s hard to understand why Griffith’s film merits anything but a place in the dustbin of history, as an abomination worthy solely of autopsy in the study of social and aesthetic pathology.
Answer:
What to produce? ➢ What should be produced in a world with limited resources?
How to produce? ➢ What resources should be used? .
Who consumes what is produced? ➢ Who acquires the product?
Explanation: