Well, because most white men were away fighting, and jobs needed to be filled, black people and women found jobs. This was a great leap in the civil rights movement, because now white people were forced to accept black people. It was bad for Japanese americans because they were forced into a racism of their own. Americans assumed that all Japanese were bad, and took them of their jobs.
I didn't use the key terms, but I hope this is a good start! (:
Booker T. Washington was an educator and a professor and his views were different from Dubois because he believed that African-Americans should emancipate themselves and become respected members of the society based on what was perceived as the correct way of living which was the way white people lived. Dubois believed that African-Americans should not become Americanized and should stick to their culture and their beliefs and that they should fight for cultural equality, not just political one.<span />
The Egyptians has hieroglyphics which is writing in pictures while the Mesopotamians has cuniform which is just writing
The most striking parallel between what each historian claims about the Mongols' influence on surrounding societies is that they almost wiped them out during an initial conquest or as reprisal for revolt.
<h3>What exactly are the Mongols?</h3>
The Mongols are a Central Asian ethnographic community of tribal peoples that live mostly on the Mongolian Plateau, speak a similar language, and have nomadic lives.
<h3>What is the most significant distinction between what each historian claims about the Mongols' influence on surrounding civilizations?</h3>
The key difference in how they describe the impact of the Mongols on the surrounding civilization is that the first writer focuses on the benefits of the Mongols after they conquered neighboring civilizations, whereas the second author concludes their description with a picture of a barbaric and brutal Mongolian dynasty.
<h3>What is one historical circumstance that might explain for the two historians' opposing viewpoints?</h3>
It is possible to conclude that the one element that accounts for the disparities in their perspectives is the individual who was at the helm of government during the times described.
The first author tells the story only from the historian's perspective of Genghis Khan, but the latter also covers Tamerlane's rule.
Learn more about the Mongols at:
brainly.com/question/17835217
#SPJ1
B.
two representative Assemblies and one powerful Senate
