1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
fgiga [73]
3 years ago
9

What was the main reason why colonists protested the british taxes

History
2 answers:
tia_tia [17]3 years ago
7 0
Because they didn't have any representation in parliament (taxation without representation)
omeli [17]3 years ago
7 0
With the French and Indian War over, many colonists saw no need for soldiers to be stationed in the colonies<span>. Britain also needed money to pay for its war debts. The King and Parliament believed they had the right to tax the </span>colonies<span>.</span>
You might be interested in
The belief that the world should be viewed realistically
likoan [24]

Answer:

Conservatism

Explanation:

Hope this helps!

5 0
3 years ago
11. (03.03 MC) Which answer best summarizes the state's responsibilities to the national government under the Articles of Confed
BigorU [14]

The answer is "States sent representatives to Congress and provided soldiers and some officers to protect the country.​"

4 0
3 years ago
What were the goals of the French Revolution? Choose four answers.
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

writing a constitution

ending absolute rule

protecting individual rights

ending the class system

Explanation:

lowering taxes for the rich is almost exactly the opposite of the goals of the French Revolution

essentially (very simply put), the wealth division among classes was extremely unbalanced. The rich were living excessively lavish lifestyles, while the poor citizens (of which there were many) barely had anything to eat.

So, the poor majority eventually were able to overthrow the ruling class, they wanted the money division among people to be fair--they did not want to lower taxes for the rich at all

8 0
2 years ago
Which of the following would NOT be considered a necessary condition for the growth of an empire?
Orlov [11]
A. - yes, you need to feed the empire!
B. - yes, you need to defend the empire!

C. - yes, you need to govern the empire!

D. - no, this would actually be detrimental to the empire, revolts would be rather bad than good for it.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
EASY QUESTION + 10 POINTS + BRAINLIEST + 5 STAR + THANKS
poizon [28]

Answer:

London

Explanation:

it will be dramatic

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did continuous warfare affect Rome
    12·1 answer
  • In one or two sentences, explain how the rule of law protects the common good
    11·1 answer
  • How did the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) differ from the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC)?
    11·2 answers
  • By 1860, the number of miles of railroad tracks throughout the United States had risen to
    8·2 answers
  • What city did the British Capture and burn government buildings during the war of 1812
    14·1 answer
  • How does a person become a candidate?
    5·1 answer
  • Why was Hitler jailed​
    12·1 answer
  • John Locke: What ideas is he known for?
    10·1 answer
  • What happens if a law is no longer considered necessary?
    8·1 answer
  • Secondary socialization takes place in institutions. What is an institution?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!