The answer to this question is the letter "B" which is "confirming a question" where Jennifer said that it is okay if Ana is not into Philosophy because she only needs to answer if the author was able to sway or convince the point of view of his writing. The question can be answered even if Ana is not into Philosophy, she only needs to evaluate if she was able to link into the Chamber's point.
I believe the answer choice would be D.
The value of a product would appeal to parents most.
Hope it helps. <3
Answer:
<em>C. How on Earth, Jenny thought, could the concert have already started when she had left an hour early?</em>
Explanation:
This is the answer because, it says that "Jenny thought" and if it was using a 1st person point of view it would simply say "I thought". And it also says that when "she" had left an hour early. If it was a 1st person point of view it would also simply say "I". And it couldn't be option A, because it said "we" when the sentence (if it was trying to be in third person) should've used "they".
It can't have been option B, because it says, "in my experience" and if you were writing it in first person it would have been "in their experience", or "in (name)'s experience".
It also couldn't have been option D. Simply because it says, "As for me" and uses "I" instead of they, she, he, or even their name.
To make it short, option A, B, and D, do not have the correct wording to be a third-person sentence.
So, in conclusion, the only third-person sentence is option C.
And that's my answer.
Answer:
At the end of Anton Chekhov's The Bet, the lawyer survives the 15 years in prison but refuses to take the money. In a literary twist, the banker plans to murder the lawyer the day the lawyer is released from prison so that he does not have to pay him.
