Why he should
-to show that the government is not weak
-to highlight the first time in the new government that troops are used to help regain control and settle people down
-the whiskey rebellion was one of the first major tests of the authority of the government and it was important to show the authority.
-it helped to calm the people down, and stop the violence after
Why he shouldn’t
-the people rebelled against the British because of taxation and as well troops coming into them, so it could start more things
-you want to listen to the people, so you don’t get overthrown/ start a new revolution
-even though money was needed for taxes and paying off debts, the target on whiskey was a mistake that impacted small farmers
-even though Washington used the troops to show authority of the new government, many will argue that he should have not used them that soon after being a new country and new form of government. As this could cause more divide between the people and the two parties that were already starting.
-the two parties being the federalists, and the democratic republicans.
Answer:
No there should not be. This would cause war and is most likely not allowed in America.
Explanation:
This is because we have laws against this.
Peter the Great was Russian ruler, best known for spearheading extensive reforms of Russia, including the creation of a centralized government and navy. He was the first Russian ruler to go on an educational trip to the West. After his return in 1698, he decided to modernize his country to make Russia a great power.
I'm pretty sure it is idiom
the answer is protective tariff.
