Answer:
To put a little bit of context , Hamilton advocated for the creation of the national bank. This advocacy was pretty polarizing at that time. Some people support him, some people don't,
Explanation:
There are several reasons that made those people supported Hamilton:
1. Ability to control Inflation.
Not all people understood the concept of inflation at that time. But Hamilton and other supporters of the national bank realized that they need a centralized institution that has the authority to control the money supply and interest rates such as the national bank.
2. Controlling the local bank.
without the existence of the national bank, the local banks will left with too much power. For example, if those local banks wants to massively increase the interest rates for loan , there will be nothing that local people do could stop it.
3. Investment policies
National banks increase the chance of the government in obtaining their monetary budget. The can do this by selling government-owned securities.
Answer: Spanish exploration of the New World was led by Christopher Columbus and Juan Ponce de Leon, who invaded and colonized great parts of what would become South, Central, and North America. The French Empire, led by Jacques Cartier and Giovanni da Verrazano, focused predominantly on North America.
Explanation: Hope this helps ;)
Answer:
In the understanding of this court case, where the plaintiff (L.M.) filed a lawsuit against Pacheco on sexual abuse, the court ruled that the perpetration of the abhorrent act committed did not have to do with Pacheco´s ´´scope of employment´´ as the act happened outside the boundaries of the church and not within his working hours. However, if the plaintiff were to argue that in fact this conduct happened within the scope of employment, she would have to explain and convince that Pacheco was indeed responsible as it is a Pastor's duty and responsibility to guide and counsel at all hours, and not just limited to his church´s hours. A pastor is a figure of responsibility as a visible head for a community, not to mention that in some churches, a pastor is also a legal representative.
Employers should be held liable for the acts of their employees whenever there is a failure to supervise employees or some kind of misdemeanor is perpetrated within the employer´s work facilities or influential premises. These points of view however, are not stated by a lawyer/judicially, these are my personal observations after having researched on the case.
The additions of House of Representatives, and Senate.
