The answer to the first analogy (mystery:clue :: eraser:) would be letter d. open. Mystery is to clue while eraser is to open. The answer to the second analogy (habit: custom :: extravagant: ) would be letter c. lavish.
1. The livelihood of local people is connected to wild elephants.
- Elephants affecting other animals and plants in an ecosystem.
2. The sanctuary helps both local people and elephants.
- Reteti experts hire local people and teach them how to care for elephant orphans.
I think that thinking more logically can promote resourcefulness
The three steps are rational, material, procedures
I think the correct answer is II and III.
The presence of an unreliable narrator means:
II. You can't trust the accuracy of the information.
<span>III. The narrator may be lying or unable to give accurate information
</span>
Having an unreliable narrator does not immediately mean that the story is all false and not worth reading. You just need to change the unreliable narrator to a reliable one.
