Answer:
Narrative History
Explanation:
Narrative history is a method of writing history in a story-based format. This way of writing history makes past events more interesting as readers can interpret and analyze these pieces of information in a way that is relatable to modern understanding. It is divided into two forms namely; the traditional and modern narratives.
- The traditional narrative follows a chronological format.
- The modern narrative explains trends that influenced certain actions of people in the past and reasons why they did certain things.
Sir Fergus Graham Burtholme Millar FBA is a British historian and Camden Professor of Ancient History Emeritus, Oxford University. Millar numbers among the most influential ancient historians of the 20th century.
The framers of the constitution intended that the Congress would play a major part in the American democracy. They left the president’s power without many boundaries, counting on check and balances as a power to hold the presidency. The framers of the constitution didn’t want the president to be a slave of the Congress, this is the reason probably the framers would be in favor of the presidency’s expanded powers, they wanted a balance between a free man who is stronger than governors but not as free as a monarch.
Like the previous person said, the belgium actions in the congo are considered atrocities, not genocides. although king leopold did kill many of the natives, people debate whether it should be considered a “genocide”. it’s more appropriate to label it as an atrocity than a genocide.
I think it is C I hope this helps -T
