Should corporations and organizations be more or less restricted in their campaign donations

History

2 answers:

Soloha48 [4]3 years ago

7 0

Sample Answer:

I think companies and groups should be more restricted in their campaign funding practices. Powerful and wealthy organizations can have too much influence over voters and the voting process. OR I think corporations and organizations should be less restricted in how they spend their money for political purposes. As the Supreme Court ruled in the Citizens United case, groups have the right to use their money to express their opinion. I believe this is protected by the First Amendment.

Oksana_A [137]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

depends on your personal view

Explanation:

You might be interested in

HURRY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ivann1987 [24]

Hi , the answer is B , Cuba 's economy weakened.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In what year did the war with Mexico begin? A. 1836 B. 1846 C. 1853 D. 1861

ivolga24 [154]

Answer: B 1846

Explanation:

tell me if im wrong

4 0

3 years ago

How did Qin Shihuangdi’s land grant policy contribute to economic growth?

Wewaii [24]

Answer:

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which action is the strongest sign of a functioning democracy? O A. Large numbers of the public serving on a jury O B. Reading a

Naddika [18.5K]

I believe it’s D ! I did some research and D seems like the only logical answer.

6 0

2 years ago

The Intolerable Acts, please give the year they were passed, explain what they did, then why the colonists were opposed to them.

Gemiola [76]

The Intolerable Acts were five laws that were passed by the British Parliament against the American Colonies in 1774.

How did they get their name?

They were given the name "Intolerable Acts" by American Patriots who felt they simply could not "tolerate" such unfair laws.

Why did Britain impose these new acts?

The British passed these acts as punishment for the Boston Tea Party.

The British thought the acts would help to maintain control in America, but they had the opposite effect causing many people to firmly join the side of the rebels.

3 0

3 years ago