Answer:
a) 0.10 or 10%
b) 0.5417 or 54.17%
Explanation:
a) The median income of $60,000 is at the 50th percentile of the distribution. If 40% if incomes are above $72,000, then an income of $72,000 is at the 60th percentile of the distribution. Therefore, the probability that a family's income will be between $60,000 and $72,000 is:
![P( \$60,000 \leq X \leq \$72,000)=0.6-0.5\\P( \$60,000 \leq X \leq \$72,000)=0.1 = 10\%](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P%28%20%5C%2460%2C000%20%5Cleq%20X%20%5Cleq%20%5C%2472%2C000%29%3D0.6-0.5%5C%5CP%28%20%5C%2460%2C000%20%5Cleq%20X%20%5Cleq%20%5C%2472%2C000%29%3D0.1%20%3D%2010%5C%25)
b) If the distribution is known to be uniform, the probability that a random chosen family has an income below $65,000 is:
![P( X \leq \$65,000)=0.5+\frac{65,000-60,000}{72,000-60,000}*0.1\\ P( X \leq \$65,000)=0.5417 =54.17\%](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P%28%20X%20%5Cleq%20%5C%2465%2C000%29%3D0.5%2B%5Cfrac%7B65%2C000-60%2C000%7D%7B72%2C000-60%2C000%7D%2A0.1%5C%5C%20P%28%20X%20%5Cleq%20%5C%2465%2C000%29%3D0.5417%20%3D54.17%5C%25)
The NAR received by the ammunition supervisor must be compiled together with ammunition option that includes unserviceable, suspended or limited use.
<h3>Who is an ammunition supervisor?</h3>
An ammunition supervisor refers to an inventory supervisor that is responsible for the supervision of the day-to-day operations within ammunition supply section functional areas.
Sometimes, when the ammunitions handlers reported that a propellant failed its propellant stability test, the Notice of Ammunition Reclassification will be used to transmit technical or precautionary data about the condition.
Read more about ammunition supervisor
<em>brainly.com/question/11457082</em>
Answer:
- KrAmerica will bear the risk of the loss
- George will not get full recovery for the value of the necklace
Explanation:
George only made some payments for the necklace and he had not taken possession of it yet. So the risk for the loss is with KrAmerica since they are the current owners of the necklace.
George was only to take possession of the necklace when payment was completed.
On the other hand George is seeking full recovery of the value of the necklace.
He has only made a part payment on the necklace, so he is not entitled to get the full value of the necklace.
Only the amount he has paid will be refunded to him.