Answer:
The overview of the perceived task is demonstrated in the following segment on the elaboration.
Explanation:
- We have to provide proof to support the argument that is already in favor. Because they're the statements as well as explanations that support the claim best. For those who do not accept the assertion, let the argument time-varying. And multiple arguments will have a specific list of supporting facts and explanations, and therefore a checklist that would not back up the claim.
- Thus, first address the consequences, which seems to be the assertion, and afterward figure out which one strengthens the theory or it doesn't accept it. But you can also, therefore, put out someone's terms.
- Note, then perhaps you should counter the argument or you should be against something. And you'll have to adhere perhaps to the absolute end, endorsing it with someone's opinions and facts you could accumulate when you're planning for the discussion.
Answer:
1,500 miles long built across northern China in the 3rd century BC; it averages 6 meters in width.
Answer:
No
Explanation:
Firstly, heavier NATO involvement in Crimea would escalate the current crisis. Shifting the focus of the confrontation from Ukraine-Russia to US-Russia would tie Putin’s hands, and virtually disable him from backing down. The strong support he received from Russia’s Parliament, along with the approval for use of the armed forces, should be seen not only as a proof of his personal strength in Russia, but also a limitation on his room for maneuver. If confronted by a NATO intervention, he would have no choice but to respond by escalating. A further hardening of Russia’s position would generate the potential for spillover in other states that Russia considers within its sphere of interest. Thus, overly aggressive NATO moves in reaction to Moscow’s moves could have a negative impact on developments relating to Transnistria, South Ossetia and Abkhazia.
source:https://www.boulevard-exterieur.com/Why-NATO-should-not-move-on-Crimea.html
Answer:
b) the Department of Defense
