1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
monitta
3 years ago
13

CIVICS How might industrialization and mass production in Europe at this time have led to social

History
1 answer:
Elenna [48]3 years ago
5 0

<u>Answer</u>:

Industrialization and mass production in Europe at this time have led to social theories, such as Marxism.

<u>Explanation</u>:

Karl Marx came with the idea of ‘Marxism’ where he believed that the workers were losing their independence because of Industrial revolution. Due to Industrial revolution, mass production required large number of workers in the factories. But they had to work in factories on the given timing and they had no control on their own lives. They were also paid less wages according to Karl’s idea of Marxism. This was unfair to the workers.

According to this theory, industrial revolution led to only two classes of people in a society: the working class and the owners of factories. So, social theories arose during this time.

You might be interested in
Explain the part each of these people played in the cause of Pan-Africanism?
Greeley [361]

Answer:

Pan-Africanism can be said to have its origins in the struggles of the African people against enslavement and colonization.

6 0
3 years ago
Who rejected the Worcester vs. Georgia ruling in hopes that the land they occupied would go to white settlers?
k0ka [10]

Answer

Andrew Jackson

Explanation

Worcester vs. Georgia ruling was a case in which the united states supreme court held that the Georgia criminal statute that prohibited non-native Americans from being present on Native Americans lands without licence which was said to be unconstitutional. On this matter Andrew Johnson rejected the ruling  hoping that the land they occupied would go to white settlers.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Reasons people married in medieval europe
Nikolay [14]

Marriage Medieval times was quite different than it is today. For one, girls didn't have a choice who they married. Girls didn't even know the man before they wed most of the time. Boys were sometimes able to choose their bride.

Marriage wasn't based on love. Marriages were political and social arrangements. Husbands and wives were mostly strangers until they first met. Love was expected to come after the couple had been married and if it didn't, the couple would at least developed a friendship of some kind.

Parents arranged their children's marriages based on monetary worth. Children were married at a young age; girls were as young as 12, and boys as young as 17. The family of the girl gives a dowry, or donation, to the boy she is to marry. The dowry goes with her at the time of the marriage and is controlled by the boy.

Once the marriage was arranged and a date was set, a wedding notice was placed on the door of the village church. This was meant to ensure that there were no grounds for prohibiting the marriage. It stated who was to be married, and asked anyone to come forward it they knew any reasons the two could not marry. If the reason was a valid, there would be no wedding.

What would prohibit a marriage? Consanguinity - a big word that meant the couple was too closely related. Ew. If the boy or the girl had taken a monastic or religious vow, like to become a Nun, Monk or Priest, the marriage would have been prohibited. A couple could also not be married during a time of fasting, like lent or advent. A couple could also not be married by someone who had killed someone!

A wedding in the middle ages never actually took place inside the church as it does today. They held the ceremony outside the church door before entering for a nuptial mass. The Groom stood on the right side and the Bride stood on the left side, facing the door of the church. The female was formed out of a rib in the left side of Adam by God and so had to stand to his left. Brides often wore blue as a symbol of purity and faithfulness. Symbolic stones were worn in medieval wedding wear. Red jasper was worn for love, Beryl for purification and Amethyst for piety and martyrdom.

Many of the same wedding rituals from Medieval times are still practiced today. The marriage ceremony has most of the same wording, the man and the woman stand on the same sides of the altar, rings are exchanged, and the ring is placed on the fourth finger. Their families would have a large feast after the wedding similar to today's wedding reception.

During a medieval wedding ceremony, the bride and groom would sit at a raised area facing the guests with other important members of the bridal party. The bridal party was there and dressed similarly to the bride and groom to fake out the bad spirits and to keep the new couple safe. A jongleur or minstrel would wander through the crowd during the feast singing love songs and reciting poems for the enjoyment of the guests.

Divorce ~ Unlike today, there were few reasons a marriage could be dissolved in the Medieval era. If either the man or woman were not of legal age, if the husband or wife had previously made a religious or monastic vow or were not Christian, and if the woman, not the man, was incapable of sexual relations the marriage would be dissolved.

Please mark me as brainliest


6 0
3 years ago
How did abolitionists respond to the capture of Shadrach Minkins?
guajiro [1.7K]

Answer:

Shadrach Minkins was an African-American fugitive slave from Virginia who escaped in 1850 and reached Boston. He also used the pseudonyms Frederick Wilkins and Frederick Jenkins. He is known for being freed from a courtroom in Boston after being captured by United States marshals under the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850. Members of the Boston Vigilance Committee freed and hid him, helping him get to Canada via the Underground Railroad. Minkins settled in Montreal, where he raised a family. Two men were prosecuted in Boston for helping free him, but they were acquitted by the jury.

Explanation:

hope this helps. :)

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was unusual about the Spanish American war?
alukav5142 [94]
By the Treaty of Paris (signed Dec. 10, 1898), Spain renounced all claim to Cuba, ceded Guam and Puerto Rico to the United States, and transferred sovereignty over the Philippines to the United States for $20,000,000. The Spanish-American War<span> was an important turning point in the history of both antagonists.</span>
7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What benefits will trump have on the usa
    13·2 answers
  • What was a main reason the US decided to end involvement in the Vietnam War?
    6·1 answer
  • A permanent resident of the United States that has citizenship with another country is called a(n) ________________________.
    6·2 answers
  • Was the western expansion good or bad for the American government
    13·1 answer
  • 1. Draw Inferences One reason for Americain imperialism was because of
    9·1 answer
  • What limits does genomic testing have as a historical source
    13·1 answer
  • Why do you think Marqués de Rubí recommended that he capital of the Spanish province of Texas be moved from Los Adaes to San Ant
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following did the idea of the social contract lead the Founding Fathers to believe?
    7·2 answers
  • Why was the National Road Built?
    13·1 answer
  • What is most of the Declaration of Independence about?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!