1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ludmilkaskok [199]
3 years ago
11

Layla was able to map circle MMM onto circle NNN using a translation and a dilation. Layla concluded: "I was able to map circle

MMM onto circle NNN using a sequence of rigid transformations, so the figures are congruent." What error did Layla make in her conclusion? Choose 1 answer: Choose 1 answer: (Choice A) A Layla didn't use only rigid transformations, so the figures are not congruent. (Choice B) B It's possible to map circle MMM onto circle NNN using a sequence of rigid transformations, but the figures are not congruent. (Choice C) C There is no error. This is a correct conclusion.
History
1 answer:
Ierofanga [76]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

(Choice A, Checked)

A

Layla didn't use only rigid transformations, so the figures are not congruent.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What did Madison say about the size of the republic? Did he want big ones or small ones and why? (You can answer with a flow-cha
victus00 [196]

Answer:

Madison argued in favor of a larger republic

Explanation:

According to his paper "Federalist 10", Madison argued that a representative body that is too small be insufficient to represent all of the interests and opinions of the nation. The larger the representative body, the better since it allows more opinions and prevents tyranny.

"...the same advantage which a republic has over a democracy...is enjoyed by a large over a small republic," (Third to last paragraph of Federalist 10)

5 0
3 years ago
Pls help me with this question
KatRina [158]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Help me with this, I’ll give brainliest
anzhelika [568]

Answer:

both are national

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Why did delegates gouverneur morris of pennsylvania and john rutledge of south carolina favor a strong central government?
Tamiku [17]

Gouverneur Morris of Pennsylvania and John Rutledge of South Carolina were known to be supporter of strong central government. They believe that states would be ineffective in governing when they are left alone. They want the national government to have absolute control. 

4 0
3 years ago
Syntax refers to the
Dennis_Churaev [7]

Answer:

Syntax refers to the grammatical rules of a language.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did earlier european intellectual movements influence the enlightenment? ​
    11·1 answer
  • What was the origin of the no-third-term tradition
    9·1 answer
  • Why would an Indiana congressman vote in favor of the Compromise of 1850 if he did not support slavery?
    11·1 answer
  • Hello my name Julia:)
    8·2 answers
  • Which was the greatest source of wealth for Ghana in 700 A.D.?
    15·2 answers
  • How did the federalists and anti federalists interpret the principle of limited government​
    6·1 answer
  • Which was an important strength of the Articles of Confederation?
    11·1 answer
  • Explain the 14th amendment in your own words
    14·2 answers
  • Please select the word from the list that best fits the definition
    13·1 answer
  • How did Jefferson violate his personal beliefs when he made the Louisiana Purchase?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!