Answer and Step-by-step explanation: The null and alternative hypothesis for this test are:
To test it, use F-test statistics and compare variances of each treatment.
Calculate F-value:
F = 1.8356
The <u>critical value of F</u> is given by a F-distribution table with:
degree of freedom (row): 20 - 1 = 19
degree of freedom (column): 20 - 1 = 19
And a significance level: α = 0.05
= 2.2341
Comparing both values of F:
1.856 < 2.2341
i.e. F-value calculated is less than F-value of the table.
Therefore, failed to reject 
, meaning there is <u>no sufficient data to support the claim</u> that sham treatment have pain reductions which vary more than for those using magnets treatment.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The answer is A. 10x - 35
F(x) function has a starting value of $6.00 and increases from there.So the y-intercept is 6.
g(x) function shows in the table that when x = 0, y = 6. This is the y-intercept.
h(x) shows on the graph that the y-intercept is 4.
j(x) is an exponential growth function, a * b^x where a is the y-intercept.
y = 10^ x^x has a y-intercept at 10.
The smallest y-intercept is function h(x).
1/2(x+6)=2x
1/2x + 3 = 2x
x + 6 = 4x
3x = 6
x = 2
5-2x+7x-h
5-2(2)+7(2) = h
h = 5 - 4 + 14
h = 1 + 14
h = 15
If I understand ur question correctly, the first one:
(16x^4)^(1/4) = 2*abs(x)
