Answer:
Albert Jeremiah Beveridge (1862-1927) was a supporter of the United States imperialism overseas, he rapidly turned into an important voice in American foreign policy. Most of Beveridge's speech functioned through the notion of Manifest Destiny , Social Darwinism, evangelism, comercial ambition, and American patriotism. Beveridge firmly stablished his arguments in the themes of liberty and civilization.
Th main idea of the Manifest Destiny, which stated that the expansion of America was in accordance to divine providence, combined with the demonstration of liberal democracy for the benefit of all mankind, meaning that the United States was provided with a mission to initiate a nation set apart by God, which would expand its advanced politics, economics, culture and religion into the world.
Manifest Destiny influenced Beveridge's reasoning in three determining ways: First, it assists his notion of Anglo-Saxon racial superiority. He believed that his race came from the Teutons, he outlined attributes that gave the Anglo-American race its undeniable superiority. In addition, Manifest Destiny gave Beveridge the idea that white Americans were God's chosen people. With God on their side, Americans replaced natives and expanded across the continent in the name of civilization.
Second, Manifest Destiny promoted Beveridge's argument for expansion as a fundamental part of God's arrangements. If the project of expansion was not attended, European powers would obtain the territories God had specifically assigned to American protection.
Finally, Manifest Destiny gave Beveridge a more ethical reason to participate in imperial actions beyond the reasoning of commercial dominion. American citizens believed God had also blessed the nation by its separation from the rest of the world's problems. By the late 1800s, involvement in the world's affairs meant that America could achieve the riches promised throughout the centuries to God's chosen people.
Explanation:
Answer:
Muhammad left Mecca to Medina so the answer it
B. Medina
The reaction of President Johnson to the Gulf of Tonkin incident did indeed show a monolithic view of Communism because he believed that Communism was dangerous.
<h3>What was the Gulf of Tonkin incident?</h3>
This was an event in 1964 when it was said that North Vietnamese navy boats attacked American naval destroyers in the Gulf of Tonkin.
The North Vietnamese were Communists and Johnson responded by increasing U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War.
This shows a rigid view of Communism because Johnson thought that it would be right to go after Communists in Vietnam because all Communists were dangerous.
Find out more on the Gulf of Tonkin incident at brainly.com/question/15593184.
#SPJ1
Such shared features include architecture, frescoes, pottery, jewellery, weaponry, and of course, the Greek language and writing in the form of Linear B an adaptation of the Minoan Linear A).
When you impose such policies, you declare how much of a certain currency can enter your country, or can leave your country. If you have different currencies this could harm your economy because it might prevent others from trading with you due to currency differences. If you do things like Europeans, then you can introduce a new policy that abolishes your old currency and adopts a widely used one like the Euro. This might boost your economy because others might invest.
<span />
